He's giving tax incentives for companies to go overseas, never began to touch gas issues or exxon profits, laughed at the bill of rights, spent as much as he could, ultimately cost the american people more by running up the deficit, drug american foreign policy threw the mud, then tried to sell 3 of our ports to UAE, told the american people they would have to be retrained, pinned more of a tax burden on the middle class by giving tax breaks to the ultra wealthy. TELL ME WHAT HAS HE DONE FOR YOU.
2006-07-05 21:41:51 · 10 answers · asked by john p 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He's given an entire of book of funny witticisms for middle class people to laugh at while eating their (smaller) dinners.
2006-07-05 21:46:27 · answer #1 · answered by corpuscollossus 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No doubt there are companies and wealthy Americans who have experienced tax breaks but so have those folks in the Middle Class and I am one of those. I didn't vote for Bush but since you ask the question I thought I would answer. Democrats always paint the Republicans as BIG Business supporters and Republicans always paint the Democrats as Tax and Spend politicians. It's true that some in each party fit the description and hype that either party puts out but there are also good people in both parties. To make a blanket statement about a party rather than consider each politician and their stands and positions is to accept the crazy labels that are thrown about without regard. To vote blindly for a party is to make way for abuse and neglect by that party for they can take your vote for granted then. When the economy does good then ordinary investors as well as the rich, Middle Class as well as the Rich, and even lower class people do better. Tax cuts across the board help everyone and while the Richer Americans pay more (a higher percentage) in taxes then naturally they get a larger (overall amount) tax break. As far as incentives for going overseas I can't comment on. If true it's very unwise and I would be profoundly against it. Got to remember though that many decisions and policies are not the presidents but rather the setting Congress that is in at the time. The President has very little power to spend money and make laws so many arrows cast at the President should rightfully be aimed at Congress, which by the way, is also Republican at the present time.
2006-07-06 04:51:58 · answer #2 · answered by alagk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Created a new class of Underpayed Professionals.
"Gas Station Window Cleaning Accountants"
"Truck Driving I.T. Network Engineers."
"Night Security Guard Computer Programmers"
And the new Middle Class:
"High School Educated Ex Army "Security Contractors""
Our Hero in Chief has also coined new terms and phrases........
'misunderestimate'
'strategery'
'OBGYN's should practice their loooove with womens'
'Ariel Sharon is a man o peace'
And brought back to the forefront of literature such favorites as:
"My Pet Goat"
So stop whining just because you cant get some gas or groceries without someone asking you for a quarter nowadays while your tax dollars ooze into the pockets of unknown connected companies, many with tiny untraceable offices in Iraq.
And leave Ann Coulter alone You big Liberal.
.... You just hate America becuz of our Freedom.
2006-07-06 06:11:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the problem may lay with the idea that our government is acting with the majority's interest at heart. Congress and the President are looking for political power and that means that they are helping the people that can keep them in power ( read the very rich and large corporations).
We just need to get all of these jokers out of office and start over from scratch. If you want to blame someone look at yourself and your friends, your votes are what let these guys get at the helm.
Its not like Eisenhower didn't warn us that this would happen.
2006-07-06 05:53:37 · answer #4 · answered by jao1283 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here's a Correction: He didn't tried to sell the seaports to the UAE, he said he was going to **Block** an veto if congress intervene in the negotiations. Basically he was giving the OK of the sale, when he didn't even knew of such negotiations. Clueless as always.
2006-07-06 04:48:14 · answer #5 · answered by lelekid4ever 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Other than saving us from Fox news Terror, in Britain it was leaked that Bush suggested to Blair that they should bomb Al Jazeera news. Of course, it's been denied and there were threats from Brits to other Brits about the leaks.
If Bush bombed Fox news, I could like him for, oh, about a minute. No more.
2006-07-08 03:21:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He wasn't elected to help the middle class, he was elected to save us from devastation. Clinton was just interested in getting blow jobs, Bush will take care of the United States. Take your little whimpy mind and go bury it back in the sand somewhere. Ron Couch
2006-07-06 04:50:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
his throwin sand in ur eayies .and runing a war on the tax payments the american public is stupid and pays for it. why did the sixtis revolution sank? u r re living vietnam but ther is no one to lead the protest and light the fire....
2006-07-06 04:50:38 · answer #8 · answered by amit g 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has saved you from having a Muslim, Arab terrorist, ram a bomb up your butt and set it off.
2006-07-06 04:53:12 · answer #9 · answered by Smartassawhip 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a GODdamn thing....
2006-07-06 04:46:44 · answer #10 · answered by Brocktoon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋