English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who was the better prez?

2006-07-05 18:39:45 · 20 answers · asked by theamericanparadox 1 in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

I kinda like my President to not masturbate into White House sinks. I also appreciate my President being able to keep his pants on during business hours.

Clinton was probably the worst President in 200 years. He did NOTHING about global warming, about energy dependency, about AIDS, about immigration, about border security, about Social Security, about terrorism. He left all these problems for the next guy.

What he did do was drastically cut our military, allow North Korea to obtain nuclear weapons, and wreck our foreign intelligence agencies.

2006-07-05 18:46:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hmmm this is a hard one.
Let's see Clinton inherited an economic boom from the Regan and the 4 years of Bush 41. He then proceeded to raise taxes and that combined with the .com crash led to the situation Bush 43 inherited.
Clinton never fought a real war. He just lobbed a few cruise missiles into Iraq claiming there were weapons of mass distruction. So was he lying to the American people then or when he later said there are no weapons of mass destruction. He even let Bin Laden go. He gave nuclear technology to the North Koreans and Chinese.

Lets see there are many things about Bush 43, but he hasn't been a bad president. There is a lower percentage of unemployment now than at any time during the entire Clinton administration. Our millitary has successfully liberated people under two separate dictatorships allowing them to establish representative governments. This has declared a psychological war on despotism and terror in the middle east.
"Never has any nation been more of a source for good, so unselfishly. We ask only for the ground to bury our dead."
I do not support amnesty without building a fence at the mexican border. It was shown not to work under Regan.
I do not support a ban on gay marriage. I support letting the laws and deffinitions stand as is without court intervention. Let the gay lobbyists sell their message to the rest of us and convince us to vote to extend their rights. I support it all ready. Let's just be honnest and not try to change the rules of the game in the dictionary rather than in the open.

I'd say bush by a nose hair.

2006-07-05 19:22:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Poll: Clinton outperformed Bush
Monday, May 15, 2006; Posted: 10:16 a.m. EDT (14:16 GMT)

In a new poll comparing President Bush's job performance with that of his predecessor, a strong majority of respondents said President Clinton outperformed Bush on a host of issues.

The poll of 1,021 adult Americans was conducted May 5-7 by Opinion Research Corp. for CNN. It had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Respondents favored Clinton by greater than 2-to-1 margins when asked who did a better job at handling the economy (63 percent Clinton, 26 percent Bush) and solving the problems of ordinary Americans (62 percent Clinton, 25 percent Bush). (Watch whether Americans are getting nostalgic for the Clinton era -- 1:57)

On foreign affairs, the margin was 56 percent to 32 percent in Clinton's favor; on taxes, it was 51 percent to 35 percent for Clinton; and on handling natural disasters, it was 51 percent to 30 percent, also favoring Clinton.

Moreover, 59 percent said Bush has done more to divide the country, while only 27 percent said Clinton had.

2006-07-05 19:26:19 · answer #3 · answered by Truth 5 · 0 0

Clinton

2006-07-05 18:43:20 · answer #4 · answered by Amy 5 · 0 0

Both have agenda's that make their supporter's richer, and oppressing the average citizen, Clinton has a higher dead body count on the way to the White House, Bush is still raising his.
Both have done a great job of getting the people to give up their rights, Both have done little to actually improve life in the US.
But unfortunately I have to choose Bush.

2006-07-05 18:51:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

At least Bush is doing something, that's more than you can say for Clinton. Clinton was even the one who let the terrorists do 9/11. Of course I guess he was pretty busy getting his nob shined.

2006-07-05 18:49:48 · answer #6 · answered by oldman 7 · 0 0

Clinton jizzed on a chubby intern and lied about it. That was his worst act as president. He was admired world wide, had a killer economy and handed over a surplus.

Bush has had some of the worst economies in US history, has screwed the environment, education, most social services, had the biggest deficit in US history, spied on American citizens, started a concentration camp, attacked a country that had no WMDs, not caught the 911 attacker and made the US a laughing stock.

You decide

2006-07-05 18:45:04 · answer #7 · answered by corpuscollossus 3 · 0 0

Bush

2006-07-05 18:44:10 · answer #8 · answered by piglet564 3 · 0 0

When history is written, it will reveal that Bush was the stupidest, most corrupt, BIGGEST LIAR, there has ever been in the white house. Clinton has my vote. Hands down OR pants down. Why Bush hasn't been impeached yet for spying on Americans, secret prisons, immigration amnesty, failures during Katrina, the highest deficit in US history or the GOP corruption is beyond me.

2006-07-05 19:13:51 · answer #9 · answered by Nancy L 4 · 0 0

Without a doubt Clinton was the better president....There was a great flow of work for everyone and all business was taken care of. It shouldn't even be a question.

2006-07-05 18:46:26 · answer #10 · answered by dimondbreez 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers