Why are apricot seeds banned in the U.S.A?

Question

I found a reasonable explaination at this link http://www.cancure.org/unapproved_by_FDA.htm but was wondering if anyone could come up with a better reason.

Answer 1

The American Cancer Society and the FDA have a list of "Unproven Methods" for cancer. As you might expect, the criteria for getting on this list are predictable: - in a natural form
- non-toxic
- not produced by the Drug Industry
- easily available without a prescription
- non-patentable

Opus, like most people in the medical field you are in a major state of denial. Ralph Moss left the Sloan-Kettering Institute when they refused to publish their findings on Laetrile. It didn’t work on all cancers, but it had stopped metastases 100% of the time.

http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/medical-history.html#cancerpolitics
How Cancer Politics Have Kept You in the Dark Regarding Successful Alternatives

A powerful conglomerate of government agencies, international drug companies, and major cancer treatment hospitals puts profits first. They do not want the public to learn about and pursue effective alternatives. The result is that chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery are the law of the land as cancer treatments-for political, not therapeutic, reasons. Most of what you have heard over your lifetime about cancer treatments is not the truth. At the very least, you have received an incomplete picture. If you believe the propaganda you have been fed and you develop cancer; it can cost you your life. In the United States, economic interests masquerade as therapeutic regimens and scientific concern. Their goal is to own and completely control a disease-cancer-as if it were a commodity, and to quash competition (meaning alternative approaches), so as to maintain a marketplace monopoly. Money leads politics by the nose. The financial interests of drug companies, conventional cancer doctors, hospitals, HMOs and others in what is known as the Cancer Establishment, have eclipsed the integrity of the Hippocratic Oath; money and politics have proclaimed conventional approaches as scientifically validated and therefore mandated by law. The terrible flaw in this convenient financial setup is that the profits that flow to the cancer establishment are derived from human lives lost to cancer be cause successful alternative approaches are outlawed or unreported. To the cancer establishment, a cancer patient is a profit center. The actual clinical and scientific evidence does not support the claims of the cancer industry. Conventional cancer treatments are in place as the law of the land because they pay, not heal, the best. Decades of the politics-of-cancer-as-usual have kept you from knowing this, and will continue to do so unless you wake up to their reality. Although rising cancer rates are bad news for patients, they are great news for the cancer treatment industry-Cancer, Inc., as some critics have labeled it. In this environment, words that sound scientific and doctorly often mask a different agenda. The phrase "treatment success" can mean profitable, while "dangerous" or "questionable" treatment can refer to therapies that threaten the profits of the cancer industry. When you begin to ferret out the economic context and motivations of cancer treatment, it helps you understand why alternative cancer therapies are suppressed or barred from the public's awareness. It helps you see why treatments as dangerous and consistently unsuccessful as radiation and chemotherapy continue to dominate the field of oncology. The reason alternative cancer treatments are not mainstream has little to do with alleged therapeutic ineffectiveness and far more to do with political control over the therapy marketplace. The politics of cancer have an overriding influence on the science of cancer and, ultimately, on what the public thinks and believes about cancer and what it is able to expect as treatment options. The doctors who perform cancer treatments and the scientists who conduct research are not the ones in control of the cancer field. It is the larger power structure of the cancer establishment that effectively controls the shape and direction of cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.' The field of U.S. cancer care is organized around a medical monopoly that ensures a continuous flow of money to the pharmaceutical companies, medical technology firms, research institutes, and government agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and quasi-public organizations such as the American Cancer Society (ACS). This is "the cancer industry," says Ralph Moss, Ph.D., extensions of which include the corporate media, public relations experts, petrochemical and nuclear industries, corporate scientists, and doctors who specialise in "killing" cancer. Cancer research has been set up almost entirely in favor of conventional approaches ever since the war on cancer, formalized in 1971 as the National Cancer Act, was first scripted in the 1960s. At that time, Senator Ralph Yarborough (D-Texas) organized the National Panel of Consultants of the Conquest of Cancer. Of its 26 members, 10 came from the American Cancer Society and 4 were affiliated with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Hospital; ...

http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/medical-history.html#cancerpolitics

Answer 2

Vitamin B17 was the subject of great controversy over 20 years ago when some of the world's top scientists claimed that when consumed, the components of the seed make it 100% impossible to develop cancer and will kill existing cancer in most cases. The pharmaceutical companies pounced on this claim immediately and demanded that FDA studies be conducted.

Vitamin B-17, also know as Laetrile and Amygdalin is found in most fruit seeds... namely apricot seeds. The apricot seed was claimed as the cure for all cancers over 35 years ago.

It was even more strongly claimed that when one eats about 7 apricot seeds per day they can never develop cancer, just as one can never get scurvy if they have an orange every day, or pellagra if they have some B vitamins every day.

The pharmaceuticals companies together with the medical establishment pushed the FDA into making it illegal to sell "raw" apricot seeds or vitamin B17 with information about its effects on cancer. Even to this day, you can't get raw apricot seeds in your health food store, only the sun dried ones which have all the important enzymes killed off.

Pharmaceutical companies only conduct studies on patented chemicals they invent so that at the end of their study, if the drug gets approved, they have sole rights on its sale. (They make back tons more than the mere 250 million that they invested) They never do studies on foods that can't be patented and that can be sold by any supermarket.

Answer 3

It is not apricot seeds specifically, but Laetrile, a compound derived from apricot seeds that is supposed to help with cancer.
It is legal in Mexico. Many people cross the border here for treatment.

Answer 4

They're not banned. I have apricot seeds in my facial scrub (St. Ives) and spit them out when I eat apricots all the time.

If you're talking about for some alternative medicine use, it is probably due to a lack of reliable research than can be duplicated.

Answer 5

You're a reading the "govt variation" of laetrile. Go to youtube and watch the real variant of what the pharmaceutical organizations don t need you to know. Do you fairly consider that the pharmaceutical firms need cancer cured? Ha! It s a multi-billion greenback a yr enterprise. Melanoma is curable naturally. Examine IT. Learn how the pharmaceutical businesses intentionally skew their scan outcome to benefit their industry most effective.

Answer 6

apricot seeds not allowed in U.S.A. I better cut down that tree then. Don't want the FDA after me. Next they'll be goin after my peach pits.

Answer 7

I never knew that! But wait, if apricot seeds are banned, then are apricots banned?

Answer 8

You are a studying the "executive variation" of laetrile. Go to youtube and watch the truly variation of what the pharmaceutical businesses don t desire you to grasp. Do you fairly suppose that the pharmaceutical businesses desire melanoma cured? Ha! It s a multi-billion buck a 12 months enterprise. Cancer is curable obviously. READ ABOUT IT. Read how the pharmaceutical businesses deliberately skew their experiment outcome to improvement their enterprise simplest.

Answer 9

because if we cured cancer, a lot of people would be out of a job. There is a lot of money to be made from people with cancer. How many times do you see ads and notices for benefits for people either sick with cancer, or just died from cancer and they want to raise money to help the family? I live in a small town and there have been dozens around here in the past year or so. I've decided that if either I or my husband develops cancer, we are NOT going the standard route. They pump you full of poison, it makes you sicker, they take all your money and lots of money from your family and friends, and you still die.

Answer 10

It's not so much that the seeds are banned, as it it illegal to market the seeds as a treatment or cure for Cancer, or to prescribe or advise any treatment involving laetrile.

Answer 11

I think apricot seeds are also referred to as laetrile. a dicey form of cancer treatment Supposedly it shouldn't be taken unsupervised, but cancer treatment is big business in the U.S. and knowing the strengths of the cancerous parasitic lobby's, getting rid of cancer would be unprofitable