Is Bush helping Bin Laden? Is Bush a traitor?

Question

Bush and the boys have decided to shut down the C.I.A's hunt for Bin Laden task force. Bush also said back in 2003 "I don't think about Bin Laden, I don't care about him, He hasn't crossed my mind".


Most of the hijackers of 9/11 were from Saudi Arabia. The same Saudi Arabia which has givin money to known terrorist groups. Bush hasn't done anything about Saudi Arabia and as a matter of fact the Bush's have a close relationship with the Saudi family.

Instead of going after Bin Laden a man who killed over 3000 Americans Bush goes after Saddam instead by putting U.S troops in Iraq instead of hunting down Bin Laden.

Do you get the feeling Bush doesn't want Bin Laden captured.

Do you ask yourself "all these wiretappings, search engine records from people, spying on people's banking records, and spending habits isn't worth anything if Bush is protecting Bin Laden?

Should Bush spend less time spying on Americans and more time actually hunting Bin Laden?

TO SAVE UP YOUR How in the hell was Osama not that important at the time? How many bodies does it take to make him #1 important. And no he is not going after him now. IF he was we would have most of our troops transfered from Iraq to hunt Bin Laden. I hope nobody in your family ever gets killed by someone. Your attitude would be "the killer is not important right now, we have better things we can do".
Your answer has just made the "all time stupidest answer", hall of fame.

Would real Americans who are horrified and fed up about Bin Laden and want his *** caught please e-mail SAVE UP YOUR and let her know how dumb her comment was.

Answer 1

Yes, yes, and yes again. Okay, having agreed with all of the above, I have to say I have a hard time personally blaming Bush for anything. Defining the problem in terms of one person might be convenient, but I takes the focus off those really responsible for the "wiretappings, search engine records," etc. I'm no Bush fan but, hey, he'd probably be a pretty decent, down-to-earth sort of guy if he weren't the leader of the free world. Well, maybe not. Anyway, in my opinion, making Bush the poster child for what's going on in America takes the focus off the huge number of people that are responsible for Bush getting control of the White House in the first place. What people? Why, the people that own or control much of the money and resources of this country. Are those people traitors? The intentional outing of a CIA agent for political reasons is, under the law, a willful breach of national security. A big time federal crime. If that isn't impeachable, what is? But his own party isn't going to impeach him, and it doesn't look like anybody else is either. I got an idea. Is Monica Lewinsky still looking for a job?

Answer 2

I dont really think we were ever looking for Osama. It is obvious that the 2 have ties. Why else would his family be flown out of this country right after 9/11? It is now rumored that Osama was instrumental in the US locating and killing Al Kazari. Iraq is not any safer for its citenzens now that the US is so called liberating the country. I believe that Sadam is a convenient patsy to a secret agenda that has been plotted over the last 45 years to accomplish a 1 world government. Everything that happens now I question. There is just too much stink going around and most people refuse to smell it. That was probably more than you wanted to know.

Answer 3

I don't agree with every decision that President Bush has made, but I don't underestimate his strategies either. It's possible that he's baiting Bin laden by making him think that the heat is off. The bottom line is the fact that there is a whole lot that we don't know, and if and when the time ever comes for us to actually learn the truth, it would be wise to consider most of the information that's been circulating throughout the globe as rumor and speculation.

Answer 4

You obviously didn't read the entire article. There was a task force specifically looking for Bin Laden. The task force has now moved onto different objectives... getting the people that are now calling the shots and most likely to target the US. HOWEVER, the search for Bin Laden continues by the CIA.
Read the complete articles and state the entire facts instead of spewing this misplaced hatred.

Answer 5

Bush is searching for Bin Laden, but he's not the one we needed to "care about" at that time. He's captured Saddam and that was #1 at the time. He's focusing on Bin Laden now. Are you still in 2003?
Addition to your remark::::Your Micheal Moore attitude has you looking like an a$$ right now. Study more, you'll figure it out. As for my "attitude", at least I tell the truth and like it is, I don't ask stupid questions. The best way to capture someone is to make them think they're not being looked for...duh to you! Clinton had Osama and let him go, why don't you cry about him? Bush is not a traitor. I do not agree with all he's done, but he's definitely not a traitor....Clinton is--he had Osama and let him go.

Answer 6

How did you come up with this ignorant junk? If you had any brains you would know Bin Laden doesn't even HAVE a country! The U.S. or any other country cannot (legally) go into a foreign country with troops and 'search' for someone. Bush is not guilty of one thing you say, get some facts!

Answer 7

i agree with u for Saudi Arabia. laden would have been caught long before twin tower was destroyed. he was know to CIA long long ago and they actually tried to catch him twice. and once he was with Saudi people and once with kids. i saw that documentary many times on history and discovery times. i agree with u that he is not concern about that. but i don't mind going for Iraq, but its just taking too long in Iraq. it should be stopped know.

But he is president of the country and he finalize the decision. so he might have thought something abuot all this things.

Answer 8

whats truly unhappy is as undesirable as bush's numbers are (and republicans in most circumstances), McCain has a valid shot this year, because although you gained't like the way a republican run the country, the democrats cant even run their own celebration, how do you screw up and leave 2 states off the convention? oh and then choose to regulate the rules after the actuality and their record of lies are staggering, be it Al Gores inventing the internet, or being the crusader for the ambience and conservation yet flooding a dry river mattress for a image op of him kayaking? or john Kerry's purple hearts for self inflicted shrapnel wounds, or complaining about republican out sourcing even as seventy 5% his wifes employer become over seas, or desirous to enhance taxes even as his relations purely paid 12% earnings tax hillery operating by skill of sniper yet nonetheless pausing to signal an autograph for slightly female, does she understand the deffinition of "is" yet? or obama having to publicly condem the guy who married him and baptised his little ones what do the democrats have nicely worth balloting for? hillery because she is a woman? or Obama brcause hes black? so i say shame on the democrats for not giving us something extra acceptable than John McCain

Answer 9

The Bush family has long known ties with the laden family. The answer is obvious.

Answer 10

hahahahahahahhaha total nonsense. You are a hypocret. Of course he is NOT a traitor. He is a patriot. He is trying to defend our country and other countrys and stop terroism. What you said is a complete nonsense

also the only way of trying to catch bin laden is to wire tap SUSPECTED Citizens that may link to him. You never know if you try. This is not helping usama you idiot