it was built pre-1960 before permit requirements. My tenant would definitely support me as she likes me (if they asked her anything)
but the ceiling is fairly low. This is in San Francisco.
Funny thing is her in-law is also illegal. We both have kitchens
2006-07-05 14:32:41 · 7 answers · asked by wuwu 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
If it was legal when built, it's still legal. If you ever have damage to the property (fire, storm, etc.) you may be required to bring it up to code.
2006-07-05 14:46:47 · answer #1 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love this question.
OK..
YES...your x-friend reported your illegal in-law. You are correct.
NO...it was built in 1961 just after the permit requirements.
NO...your tenant will not support you. She is lying.
YES...the ceiling is low, but it's within the limits of the permit.
NO....this is not in San Francisco...it's in Oakland.
NO...it is not funny that her in-law is illegal. It's illegal.
NO...you only have one kitchen. It's in the red opal thingy.
2006-07-05 21:43:04 · answer #2 · answered by Spencer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rephrase that to make sense, please, but if any of you are illegals, I hope you are all reported, no matter if you have kitchens and low ceilings.
2006-07-05 21:47:35 · answer #3 · answered by save_up_your_tears 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This question seems to be about two different subjects. Makes no sense as it is written.
2006-07-05 21:38:46 · answer #4 · answered by pottersclay70 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
your question makes no sense to me.
2006-07-05 21:35:54 · answer #5 · answered by malintzin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if thats a question, try to rephrase it.
2006-07-05 21:39:10 · answer #6 · answered by deftlychillin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And no bathrooms?
2006-07-05 21:40:00 · answer #7 · answered by ricardocoav 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋