2006-07-05 12:38:37 · 18 answers · asked by athorgarak 4 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
ok nobody fell for it! LOL There is almost always some idiot who jumps the gun and answers as if it were the classic irresistable force and immovable object question. very good everyone!
2006-07-05 12:46:15 · update #1
I believe we have a contradiction here .
2006-07-05 12:41:37 · answer #1 · answered by SADFHorde 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is my 2 cents. i'm no longer an authority and it would desire to be thoroughly incorrect, yet i might want to supply my opinion on what i think of might take place. i anticipate when you consider that we will not attempt this we'd desire to constantly relate it issues that are like it, i.e. Albert Einstein. i can't think of of a few thing it quite is unstoppable or immovable, so permit's use easy coming off the sunlight by way of fact the unstoppable merchandise and the Earth by way of fact the immovable merchandise. the sunshine might refract for that reason, so it possibly does no longer artwork. the element is to aim issues that are close adequate. in case you may get ninety 9.9% precise that's close adequate. close adequate to understand the equation and to discover a extra helpful relativity after the 1st problem. So by way of fact the sunshine from the sunlight and the Earth did no longer artwork that could recommend the unstoppable merchandise might might desire to be as huge if no longer bigger. whether it quite is as huge, say yet another earth, then they might become pool balls and leap away or they might combine. in the event that they do no longer look to be the same medium the unstoppable merchandise might pass with the aid of or be refracted. If we take area out of the equation and the unstoppable merchandise is already colliding with the immovable merchandise then the unstoppable merchandise ceases to pass yet remains rotating/vibrating in direction of it. over the years the unstoppable tension remains shifting yet with 0 velocity. i might anticipate it would refract if that grew to become into the case, yet whilst the two have been balanced they might stay in stand nonetheless with the unstoppable merchandise rotating/vibrating in direction of the immovable merchandise. I might desire to consider a pair human beings in here that stated friction happening. If friction happens then i might anticipate the unstoppable tension might supply up and the unmovable merchandise initiate. i might use the expression a million/endless or a million/x, if we nonetheless had time interior the equation. in case you have a threat of a few thing occurring it is going to take place, yet thinking time is endless or x then we are able to no at the instant are conscious of it. i anticipate the only thank you to become attentive to it is to be certain extra advantageous than time and area or get as close as a threat with relativity. or you relate it to the Higgs Boson. You destroy 2 debris and create a smaller particle. the belief to me is that we can't understand this thought on a great scale, yet probably a smaller one.
2016-12-10 05:05:39 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats impossible, they r immovable man, how come they can collide ??!!
if so, there is at least one of them must be moving
2006-07-06 05:18:17 · answer #3 · answered by Kevin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they could be not moving but in different universes and whne then universes with different in different dimentions collide the two objects will dissapear as einstein explained the substance and nonsubstance saying that we canm have 2 different parallel universes in different universes but now we know mathematically that it is possible to have 5 different parallel universes in 11 dimentions (the M theory)
this is the only mathematical possible explanation i know its quite in a higher level than what ever you meant in your question but the typical answer would be 2 nonmovable objectys will not collide unless one of them moved
but in the M theory space can fold and universes can collide
2006-07-05 12:55:25 · answer #4 · answered by DR. Raed 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they dont collide because they are immovable, in order to collide (touch) they must be right next to each other, if you cant move them they cant collide
2006-07-05 12:42:21 · answer #5 · answered by Dries 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they are immovable,How can they collide? My guess is nothing happens.
2006-07-05 12:46:18 · answer #6 · answered by phockit47 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hears the answer=its a(BULL**it)question
its like asking (what is the sound of one hand clapping)
its a trick question that cant be answered .
..................think about it! If you have 2 objects
that are incapable of moving toward each other
then how in the hell can they collide?
2006-07-05 14:22:33 · answer #7 · answered by sketch_artist_1 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, I'm confused...if they are immovable...how did they collide?
2006-07-05 12:43:26 · answer #8 · answered by J Somethingorother 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If their immovable, they wouldn't collide.
2006-07-05 17:17:46 · answer #9 · answered by boter_99 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What an intriguing question.
Certainly one of them must have just been developed or created inside of the other. Possibly they must then at once become and remain, one.
On the other hand, they might be just permanently identified as One inside the Other.
2006-07-05 12:45:03 · answer #10 · answered by old-tired-and-poor 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At least one of them had to be moving in order to collide.
2006-07-05 12:41:47 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋