When it's quite obvious that he cheated his way into the White House in the first place? There was a big uproar when he got in first time, why didn't the good american public give him the flick?
2006-07-05 12:27:01 · 27 answers · asked by ? 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Not very bright it seems!!!
2006-07-07 05:07:52 · update #1
He was not voted in the second time either. The election was rigged and everyone knows it.
2006-07-05 12:30:50 · answer #1 · answered by sassyk 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush won in 2000 despite attempts by the Gore campaign to cheat their way into the White House, with the aid of the Main Stream Media (ie calling Florida for Gore before Florida's western polls had closed!) He won in 2004 because the good American public could see he was doing a good job. Hope this clarifies things for you doll.
2006-07-06 08:37:29 · answer #2 · answered by smoot 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because George W. Bush was lots better than Hanoi John Kerry who slandered American troops in Vietnam. This idiot belongs in prison along with Hanoi Jane Fonda. President Bush did not cheat his way into the White House. Better get your facts straight.
2006-07-05 12:36:21 · answer #3 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He didn't cheat his way in the first time. He won the electorate, which is what is required in this country to win the Presidential Election....regardless of what the leftists say.
We voted him in the second time because the majority of us believed that his opponent, John Kerry, would not do as good a job as President Bush.
2006-07-05 12:32:58 · answer #4 · answered by NateTrain 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is actually a two part question.
1. “WHY”. Why is a question that great philosophers have been asking for thousands of years. Plato asked Aristotle, Aristotle asked Homer and Homer asked Jethro. None of them could answer the question “Why”.
2. “Was George Bush voted in for a second term.” YES
2006-07-05 12:35:44 · answer #5 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in case you want to get each and every of how right down to brass taxes you should assert the Democrats elected Bush in case you consider there are extra Democrats in this u . s . a . than Republicans...if lots of the Democrats did not vote in 2004 yet a variety of of the Republicans did then that is honest to assert the Democrats that did not vote in essence voted for Bush by using not vote casting in any respect. i comprehend this can get a thumbs down although that is real, it really is why anybody ought to vote.
2016-11-01 06:36:02 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ummm, because at that time, he was going against Democrat John Kerry, and won fair and square. How can you take the message of pop culture bands so seriously, when all that they're trying to do is make a few bucks for being anti-bush.
2006-07-05 12:31:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why is it only democratic voters are completely retarded and unable to vote properly? Hanging and pregnant chads just don't seem to be a problem with republicans. Maybe when democrats raise their IQ's they can come up with some original reasons for constantly losing elections.
Until then, keep living your fantasies so we can stay in power.
2006-07-05 12:33:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably just because of the situation America was in at that time.......it kind of just seemed like a bad idea to get a new person into office when America was at a VERY difficult time.....and maybe because there was a little slide for his favor!!! Your guess is as good as mine!! ;)
2006-07-05 12:32:29 · answer #9 · answered by Sol 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cause the bent people who count the votes and the Jews , the Italians, and other real groups who run that country decided that was that was the way it was gonna be.
Wake up and smell the coffee those who are blind to the truth.
2006-07-06 05:35:47 · answer #10 · answered by simonc12345 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Collective Stupidity!
2006-07-05 12:32:34 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋