guess not =( he's as bare as a babies bottom
fuzzy wuzzy was his name but he is not very fuzzy so acctually he is not fuzzy but he is fuzzy wuzzy... make sense?
oh guys, dont be so mean to him! why would you even answer this question if you thought it was stupid? and why would you call this abuse? he was just having a good time asking this question so dont rain on his parade, ok? thanks
2006-07-05 11:15:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
yes he wuz!!!
Because Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear and Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair, all Fuzzy Wuzzy could be was a little fuzzy!!!
:o) Good one to ponder!! Thanks!!
P.S. To people who believe they are the Report Abuse Gestapo.....shut it down!!! All categories are relative. This was news to me!!! I had NO IDEA some may not have known that Fuzzy Wuzzy really was fuzzy and not hairy!!!
2006-07-05 11:34:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by anonymous12 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear
Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair
Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't fuzzy was he?
So no he wasn't fuzzy
2006-07-05 11:17:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by da_hammerhead 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no fuzzy wuzzy isnt fuzzy any more but back in the 70s he had a fro goin on
2006-07-05 11:18:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by nikki s 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bears are fuzzy; but now days all beavers are bare I'm so sad :(
2006-07-07 21:34:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Last time he came over for drinks... he showed me exactly how fuzzy he really was...
2006-07-05 16:47:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Beautiful Disaster 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You definitely need some professional help.
2006-07-05 11:15:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by nightsoul_7 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Reported for abuse.
This isn't news nor is it an event.
Plus, excessively stupid question marks.
2006-07-05 11:17:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes he wuzzz
2006-07-05 11:15:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Judas Rabbi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋