Anything that doesn't pander to the typically liberal Hollywood agenda and very often points out the hypocritical behavior of the Hollywood elite. The "evil rich" aren't much better, so it's often fun to watch both extremes make fools out of themselves.
2006-07-05 11:12:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by bobby_knight_hired_coach69 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Quick question, where do you have a reference of a Hollywood star calling the wealthy the "evil rich"? (And just saying "I've heard it, or "people have said it" isn't a source and is not acceptable in making an argument).
If it were the case that it's true it's easy to differentiate between those who do good with their wealth vs. those who do not (I would call them greedy instead of "evil".)
The Buffets, the Gates, the Rockefellers, the Carnegies, etc. They will go down in history for the great things they've done with their wealth. Paris Hilton is an example of what makes the rich so disgusting. Richard Scaife is a pretty nasty rich man.
Yes, I agree people can do anything (legal) they want with their wealth. When people have more than is possible to spend and still don't share it to make the world a better place then I am fully reminded of the Bible, when it says:
Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.
Matthew 19:24
So, that may guide you just a bit as to what they mean when they
say the "evil rich".
2006-07-05 18:14:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by WBrian_28 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The evil rich are the ones that actually EARNED their money, by hard work and effort, not from arts or media. That is why most actors are liberals, they do not understand the value of "hard earned money." Denzel Washington worked hard before Hollywood made him rich. He knows and remembers where he came from.
2006-07-05 18:12:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mark W 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
luxocrats. Rich evil people who rule the world. Pay attention to civilization. "Democrats" and "Republicans". Rich white bankers
and big money men. The CEOs of the fortune 500 companies.
They have no consience. We could have cars that get 400 miles to the gallon, for instance, if it were not for their evil and petty greed.
WE could have ended world poverty, crime, and most of human suffering, were it not for the 1 percenters who own 99 percent of the worlds land and real assets.
The people who with wisdom could use their billions to make the world heaven, but, who trhough stupidity, bad programming, lies,
propaganda, greed, selfishness and deciet, end up driving civilization to be cruel and cold and calculatingly cutting to the "little people."
those folks. hope that clear it up.
2006-07-05 18:20:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by kucitizenx 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most seem to hate capitalism and big corporations when they are usually far richer than a lot of these people so they are hypocrites of the first degree in my opinion and constantly looking to bash our President. A lot of them probably deep down believe that communism or socialism is better than capitalism.
2006-07-05 18:47:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by toughguy2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well a lot of em are Liberal Hypocrites who deem it ok for themselves to get drunk on all the French wine they want rather than using their French wine money to prove they care for the wounded Troops when they really could care less if our Troops get blown up.
And these same Liberal Celebs try to tell us how to live but they don't do that themselves such as Rosie O'Donnell said anyone who owns a Gun should go to jail but she hired Armed Guards to protect her fabulous Mansion.
2006-07-05 18:11:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by MrCool1978 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are referring to an imaginary stereotype which is not politically incorrect to bash, much like what is used by others to bash people of various races or ethnicities, in order to push their anti-capitalist agenda.
2006-07-05 18:18:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by e1war 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They're referring to Republican politicians. They exclude themselves.
Democrats do much the same thing. Billionaires like John Kerry criticize "tax cuts for the rich", but you'll notice he spent his tax cut.
Hillary Clinton wants the poor to have more, but do you see her tossing HER money from a helicopter? No. What she means is, she wants YOU to provide, not her.
2006-07-05 18:17:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush and his family, of course !
2006-07-06 12:39:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
the fiscal conservatives that use their power to do harm to American Citizens,,and the USA,, due to their GREED,,,,,,,,,,,,
2006-07-05 18:28:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋