Not too many years ago a young T Rex was found in sandstone in the northwest. The sandstone could not be fit in the helicopter to cart it outta there so the fossil was broken in half and to everyone's surprize, red dino meat inside with stretchy tissue and blood vessels
Call me a skeptic but hows come something over 65million years old would have soft tissue and blood cells. Is it more reasonable that it was thousands not millions of years ago.
Even a few years back there were some T Rex spots, remants of blood cells and no one believed blood cells from a T Rex would survive millions of years ... and now... what say you
A) the T Rex is less than 65 million years old
B) take some DNA samples quick Jurassic park was a cool movie
C) those short arms definitely cant swim the thing drown in some kinda flood to be encased in limestone
D) If you put this on an essay in science class fogetaboutit as they say in Joisey your getting a 'look' from the teacher
2006-07-05 10:05:46 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Earth Sciences & Geology
b and a)
2006-07-05 11:46:15 · answer #1 · answered by jredfearn08 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well what do you think the mythical dragons our ancestors talked about were? The T Rex is less then 65 million years old, even if the story you just told is false.
*** Guess it wasn't false...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7285683/
Yep, definitely less than 65 million years old. Great catastrophes have swept over the Earth that have really messed with the electrical properties of vast expanses of land. There is a definite electromagnetic connection between all things, from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy. When this great catastrophy swept our planet, it created the ice at our poles, gave our planet its wobble, and made everything seem a lot, lot older when we subject it to carbon-dating or any other kind of dating.
Sift through some of my "questions" that I didn't really ask but just posted a lot of information on. Particularily the Mars stuff. Venus zapped the hell out of it.
2006-07-05 12:11:51 · answer #2 · answered by Tony, ya feel me? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Remember three things:
1) The fossilization process is not well-understood
2) We have no reason to believe that soft tissue could not survive that long in the abscence of bacteria and air.
3) All cases of fossilization are extremely odd and unique. It has been estimated that the fossil remains of everything that is alive today would fit in a duffel bag with room to spare. Finding soft tissue is strange, but not inexplicable.
2006-07-05 10:14:40 · answer #3 · answered by Argon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋