2006-07-05 09:23:25 · 7 answers · asked by lolo l 1 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
not the silo. i mean the barn
2006-07-05 09:27:59 · update #1
Do you mean the silo-Thats where the grain is kept I.
2006-07-05 09:26:55 · answer #1 · answered by Marge Simpson 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possibly the farmer wanted all his cows facing in toward the center. He could go up in the haymow and throw hay down in one place for the cows to eat. Rectangular barns have several openings in the haymow to thrown down hay, so a round barn would be less walking for him.
2006-07-05 09:31:38 · answer #2 · answered by cowgirl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because there is a greater volume to surface ratio than a rectangular or square barn therefore using fewer materials (more cost efficient) and it gave greater structural stability, they were self supporting (no beams holding up the roof allowing for more interior room remaining free).
2006-07-05 10:01:10 · answer #3 · answered by mzmscheeveeuhs 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So farmers could drive city slickers crazy. When they asked where was the bathroom the farmer would tell them to just go in a corner of the barn....lmao Thanks for the 2 points!!!
2006-07-07 09:25:15 · answer #4 · answered by frnzcallmebub 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are architecturally interesting. Not everthing is only functional, not everything is only decorative. Most innovative architecture is both. Look around.
2006-07-05 09:30:04 · answer #5 · answered by jagresss 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
so the animal can walk in a circle.duh!!
2006-07-05 09:27:57 · answer #6 · answered by Christina 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not around here
2006-07-07 15:21:17 · answer #7 · answered by zqx357 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋