2006-07-05 08:46:03 · 15 answers · asked by kknights81 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Both movies are good, but in their own ways. Silence of the Lambs is more of a psychological thriller, whereas Hannibal is more of a romantic/gothic horror film.
2006-07-05 09:49:17 · answer #1 · answered by V for Victor 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Since there was never a movie called "Hannibel Lector," I'll have to go with Silence of the Lambs.
2006-07-05 15:50:59 · answer #2 · answered by jhlhart 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hannibel Lector
2006-07-05 15:55:00 · answer #3 · answered by CoolGuy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only Silence of the Lambs was a movie right? Hannibal Lector was just a character in the movie
oh ur right Hannibal is a movie.
I think Hannibal was better.
"it puts the lotion on it's skin" lol
Silence of The Lambs was creepy
2006-07-05 15:49:31 · answer #4 · answered by Who me? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Silence of the Lambs
2006-07-05 15:48:53 · answer #5 · answered by ilikesew 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Silence of the Lambs.
2006-07-05 20:14:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Silence of the Lambs is substantially more creepy even if you see Hannibal.
Lechter is almost a good guy near the end of Hannibal whereas he never really gains redemption in the first movie.
2006-07-05 15:50:07 · answer #7 · answered by molex77 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
SIlence of the lambs
2006-07-05 16:42:29 · answer #8 · answered by NEOTEH 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I haven't seen Hannibal yet, but I want to. I just saw Silence of the Lambs over the weekend and I absolutely lived it. It's definitely my favorite scary movie.
2006-07-05 15:58:58 · answer #9 · answered by ZachsLadyyy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Silence of the Lambs
They were both excellent books, but Hannibal was ruined as a film because they chose to deviate from the book's ending.
2006-07-05 15:49:33 · answer #10 · answered by Sophie832 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋