If it was right and not against nature,wouldn'y they be able to have kids and have a family without having to go to a sperm bank or adopt kids? What do you think?
2006-07-05 06:32:30 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I just want to make it clear that I have nothing against them. It's their choice.
2006-07-05 06:37:05 · update #1
I have to ask myself, why I keep answering questions like this. Clearly uneducated questions from people who have already formed their opinions without hearing anything about the issue. People like you, who fall right into the propaganda and never had an independent thought in their lifetime. People who don't even know me, but have decided to hate me regardless.
I'll have to take steps to correct that in my own life. But first let me tell you in seriousness. My relationships? Their none of your business. I don't care what you think about them, what your bible and your mama tell you about them. You don't get a say.
At all.
2006-07-05 06:41:20 · answer #1 · answered by Miss Red 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think there is nothing wrong with people who are gay, lesbian, or bi. I also think it is natural because science has proven that there is a gay gene. And just because they can't procreate does not mean that they should not have children or adopt them. There are so many children out there in need of a good home. Homosexuality does not mean someone is a bad person, they can give a child a good home and a chance that some straight people probably could not. If they aren't doing anything wrong or hurting others, let them be!
2006-07-05 14:46:41 · answer #2 · answered by jjdanca18 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many heterosexual couples go to sperm banks and adopt children, using your logic, their relationships are against nature.
Just let it go, these relationships exist whether you like it or not. You can't stop it, you can't change, just forget about it. Leave it alone. Move on.
2006-07-05 13:37:30 · answer #3 · answered by starting over 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It don't matter what we think its their life they can choose to do whatever they want with their life. What does it matter to you if they prefer a certain lifestyle? Its the same as a straight person not having kids or a woman who can't get pregnant. Are they wrong for not fitting into your standards of "normal"? No its just a part of life.
2006-07-05 13:37:46 · answer #4 · answered by ♥c0c0puffz♥ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Draw me a picture of how it wouldn't be against nature. I don't care if people are gay/lesbian/or bi, but I will not believe it is NATURAL.
2006-07-05 16:36:26 · answer #5 · answered by 1/6,833,020,409 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are straight couples that can't have children. Does that mean that "God" doesn't want them to have any?? Most people can't help the way they are. I'm not ashamed of who I am, but I know I didn't ask to get that "tingle" when I see women. Things are the way they are.
2006-07-05 13:38:57 · answer #6 · answered by ♥michele♥ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i am not for gays and lesbians and stuff but i have no say in those peoples lives. i would never be anything but straight and that is my decision and others make their own decisions it is someones own personal decision and i don't descriminate against gays and lesbians but i don't agree with it either.
2006-07-05 13:40:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You think that gays should be able to procreate.I suppose that you could be hetero and go to a sperm bank.
2006-07-05 13:41:03 · answer #8 · answered by Balthor 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think gay relationships are more meaningful than a straight relationship. Because they had to work for that relationship. People had to fight for their right to have that relationship.
2006-07-05 13:46:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that sexual orientation should be a reason to like or dislike a person.
2006-07-05 13:36:13 · answer #10 · answered by nedoglover 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋