Now I think Eistein(spelling) must have got it wrong here. How can two synchronised clocks show different times sometime later if all that differentiates them is the speed at which their containers (one, a faster than the speed of light spaceship, and the other, on on my tv in my bedroom) travel. In other words, would the hands of the two clocks or numbers in the two digital watches show different times just because of the differences in speed at which their containers travel?
My experiments (yet to be published) show something other than mere speed expalains the differences in time. Indeed time is not relative without reference to distance and speed. Speed alone can't change the moments of time recorded by the two clocks or watches.
All things being equal ( presure on the clocks especially as the one on the space ship is likely to have more presure on it) except speed, moments of time of the two synchronised clocks wont change. I am sorry Eistein.
2006-07-05 02:36:29 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Okay, look. Hook this into your equation.
D=RT Distance equals rate times time. Set a distance.(you gotta get a pretty big distance and try to keep the rate the same, so you can get an exact measure. Now that you have the distance and the rate, you can measure the time it should take. Now you have the clock that is sitting still(relative to the earth) and the clock that is moving. (See if you can get milliseconds, even nanoseconds.) Now measure the diffence. It may not be big, but it will be there trust me.
2006-07-05 05:43:23 · answer #1 · answered by Randall M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are not alone. Many renown scientists have had this nagging feeling for years. If you travel 30miles per hour, you get to the end of a 30 mile distance in 1 hour. If you travel the same distance in 60miles per hour, you get to the end in 30 minutes. So it takes different times to get to end as a result of differences in time.
But take distance out of the equation, and speed alone can't modify time without other variables such as presure being factored. To hold everything constant, except speed, the concept of time change is stupid to an extent, and some renown scientists agree.
2006-07-05 02:54:48 · answer #2 · answered by Fontonfrom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Speed DOES change the time. But you got something wrong here. Of course the clock would show the same time, beacause speed will not change a machine, though the time is changing. See? Time will change, but the clock is just something we created to measure time and it does not show differences on it, since its only a machine. The time will change without showing up in your clock. You biological time though, will change. You will not get as older as if you were on earth. One more thing, nothing can go faster than the speed of light, said Einstein.
2006-07-05 02:51:37 · answer #3 · answered by rafazanca 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Time does slow down at high speeds because the pendulum/ photon/ whatever yoyu are using to measure time. has to move farther through 3-d space to complete one cycle. That is why time slows down because the velocity of light is constant from any perspective. Basically you're wrong and you are tryring to second guess one of the greatest thinkers in the history of the human race. Good job moron
2006-07-05 03:45:33 · answer #4 · answered by Jacob G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From what I know that is wrong. You need a clock that doesn't measure time by using exact movements of hands or spinners, you need an atomic clock using photons. Then by traveling at a faster rate of velocity you will slow down the movement of time because of how your frame of reference is affected by velocity.
2006-07-05 02:48:31 · answer #5 · answered by Jake 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
time will only become slower if you travel with the speed of light.
reason : time is define as the movement of particles. time exists because the particles and atoms in this world always moves and changes [remember that scientists use atom clock to measure the time precisely base on the change and the movement of the atom. when we travel with the speed of light, the particles in our body and vehicle [that travel with the speed of light] will become slower, and base on this, the time will runs slower, so it means that you won't be old if you travel with the speed of light...
2006-07-05 04:56:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are so full of crap your breath stinks! You're like those dimwits that audition on "American Idol" who make a noise like three pigs trying to get through a two-pig hole in a fence, then go ballistic because no one but them realize how great they think they are. You're undoubtedly a legend in your own mind, what there is of it.
2006-07-05 04:14:15 · answer #7 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm not sure, yet... the 1st 3 are actual. The fourth one is meh. The gas pedal quickens your vehicle, which differences the speed, so i think this is actual. 5th and 6th are actual. i think of they are all actual, so i'm not sure. this is seems slightly surprising that they had all be actual, yet i think of they are.
2016-12-08 15:54:51 · answer #8 · answered by morenosmith 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm ... so, you're right and all the thousands of experiments that have shown time dilation are wrong? I'd like to hear more about this.
2006-07-05 02:40:07 · answer #9 · answered by J C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why is there never a genius around when you need one, eh? Oh hold on, Professor Stephen Hawking's about on Answers... maybe he could help you validate your experiments.
2006-07-05 02:44:12 · answer #10 · answered by mdfalco71 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋