English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i am haveing a debate.....it dosen't have to be princeton, but any high class university

2006-07-05 02:16:22 · 14 answers · asked by Vanessa W 2 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

14 answers

Hello,

First of all just because someone goes to a high class university dosent mean that they are smart. They could be book-smart, but not actually smart.

Alot of people i know that could have gone to the High class university didn't because that isn't for them.

Reading books just broadens your mind, and it is how you use that in the real world. some people i know love to speak in dictionary lingo, so i spoke back unto 20 ways of saying something they were shocked.

a good example is the founder of Microsft, Bill gates, he didn't even go to University....

I agree that anyone can be book smarts but something are not for all people okay..... and some people do not need to be trained to be smart as a whole ........ being smart is of somwhat different to what it used to be ..in the ancient ages....

so you cannot judge a book by its cover..someone above made a point that their parent could be rich that is so true or they could have some connections......that dosent make a person smart......

Look deep and you will search what you are looking for, you don't have to go to a high class university, it does help but in this world we live in today....experience in most cases outweighs top universities.

2006-07-05 02:34:38 · answer #1 · answered by kida_w 5 · 7 3

No, education does not equal intelligence. Some of the most stupid people on earth are the most educated. One example that comes to mind, is a plan I read about that NASA had spent a little time theorizing about bringing the Moon down on the South Pole. These are the same people that tell us that a mile wide asteroid striking us will destroy life on Earth! The reason for this insane plan: correcting the angle of the Earth's alignment. In other words: even seasons year round. DUMB!

Conversely a man in India came up with most of the rules of algebra indepndently without having ANY formal education. He was able to do this because he was a genius.

No education definitely does not equal intelligence.

2006-07-05 02:33:31 · answer #2 · answered by scrapiron.geo 6 · 1 0

People who get into Ivy League schools are already smart to start with. Reading books is good for mental work, as it trains the mind to interpret and retain data. But just being able to read well and to retain facts is not "intelligence." It is what one does with the information one has and how fast one does it that is the measure of intelligence.

You might mean by your question "Do activities that excercise the brain help increase its abilities?" and the answer is a definite yes. Nobody is going to become a genius who is not one, but hey, it has been found that just plain not watching TV will increase people's IQ by several points.

So working at mental tasks - learning the skills, like effective reading and mathematical principles and calculations, used in school work, and practicing memorizing - will develop one's given ability to process information, and acquiring information and data to use when thinking, as well as learning such processing skills as logic and inference and so on, are all a very major part of what is called Education.

In sum, people have "native" abilities mentally, but their abilities are actuated and developed by excercize and practice.

2006-07-05 02:42:44 · answer #3 · answered by sonyack 6 · 0 0

large quantities of understanding does not equate to intelligence. Why may a Harvard Graduate who changed into in the real 10% of his type be coaching severe college? someone that wise should be doing some thing extra do not you imagine? And no offense yet he's were given 2 PhD's at 27. vast whoop. What are those PhD's in to commence with? And it merely ability he merely stayed in college after his Bachelor's degree. maximum carry close tiers take about 2 years to receive, and he ought to have merely as honestly been engaged on both PhD's for those 4 years. now to not say that it is not an accomplishment or that that is undemanding, it really is merely not as demanding as you may imagine to receive one. And so what? So he's wise. that doesn't advise he's excellent. there have been a variety of of very wise those which have come and lengthy previous, and that i don't believe of they were excellent. Hitler changed into really smart. i don't believe what he concept changed into excellent in any respect structure or kind. Do you? What you fail to understand, is that one and all he did changed into say what he believed. Does he have any data to lower back his claims? he's not a biologist, so he's not likely to be an authority on that situation. He may in chemistry or physics, yet those are 2 very different topics. Now, which could now to not say that technological know-how and faith are incompatible. yet i'm guessing that your PhD Chemist/physicist, is going to assert that even as his branches of technological know-how do not conflict, that biology and evolution may. See the difficulty there? i'm not asserting that he has to settle for evolution, and if he has some fantastic study or attempt that disproves the theory, then he ought to modern-day it. yet when he denies the data, then he's not a real scientist. Scientists persist with the data, they don't seem making the data fit their concepts. I actually have heard many believers say that they sense technological know-how tells us the how and faith provides us the why. yet none of them were Biblical literalists. None of them concept the earth changed into in ordinary words 6000 years previous.

2016-11-01 05:50:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As a general guideline, which means there may be several exceptions, ivy league schools produce academic achievers because they cost a lot of money. And if a school costs a lot of money, that means its students (or thier parents) have a lot of money, which usually means that the family is pretty smart-- in the interest of maintaining thier fortunes.

The rich have to stay rich, so they spend mad resources educating thier kids so they won't blow it for the family.

There are, however, mad scholarship and grant funded students that are outstanding as well.

2006-07-05 02:22:43 · answer #5 · answered by ishotvoltron 5 · 0 0

Only if they absorb the information from the books and make it part of their life. They will then have lots of facts at their command, potentially.

To be truly intelligent, though, one must take the factual knowledge and be able to put it together in non-linear ways and be able to apply it to other situations.

2006-07-05 02:21:17 · answer #6 · answered by blueowlboy 5 · 0 0

Going there does not make you smart. Getting there you need to be smart.

Reading always helps but if you don't understand what you read....not.

You have to be some sort of smart to get more smart so to speak.

2006-07-05 02:21:08 · answer #7 · answered by Puppy Zwolle 7 · 1 0

someone who goes to Princeton has rich parents

2006-07-05 02:19:40 · answer #8 · answered by LifeOfAgony 5 · 0 0

you don't get smart by going to a good university.

you have to be smart before they let you interview in the first place.

....

and i don't remember shania twain ever saying or doing anything smart. she is probably one of the few women in showbusiness who regularly wears things cleverer than she is.

2006-07-05 02:23:15 · answer #9 · answered by synopsis 7 · 1 0

Nope! Being a bookworm doesn't make anyone smart.Theory is way far of from Reality.

2006-07-05 02:18:53 · answer #10 · answered by whateverman 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers