English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-05 02:10:49 · 13 answers · asked by Cliffather 2 in Politics & Government Government

Why would this be bad?

2006-07-05 02:13:10 · update #1

13 answers

We can't even agree on a standardized worldwide measurement system, so I don't think you shall ever hope to see the "New World Order" where we have an integrated world political body running the world.

2006-07-05 02:16:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Asking if we want to go to a world-wide government is pretty much like asking the thirteen states who declared independence from Great Britain if they wanted to form a united nation. The answer is yes. They, of course, pretty much had the advantage of a common language and legal system, but there were non-trivial differences such as the role of church and state and disagreement over trade policy, but they worked together to form a common nation.

A world government is desirable if it can be designed to not allow one faction to dominate all others. A federal system, much like what the United States has, or a looser system like Switzerland's, has proven to work, and there is no reason to suspect that it cannot world on a global scale. Yes, there is been independence movements over the last twenty years that have produced fifteen new nations out of the Soviet Union and six out of the former Yugoslavia, but consider that to be a re-aligning of common ethnicity rather than fragmentation.

As long as we have sovereign nations that are answerable to only themselves or other under threat of conquest, there will be far too much energy devoted to preserving borders that are no longer as meaningful as they had been. Only by creating a system where nations are answerable to a greater but less menacing authority can we divert this energy into constructive uses. We need not surrender our cultures, but we must seriously consider giving up the right to conduct war with what is essentually our fellow man.

2006-07-05 02:29:00 · answer #2 · answered by Ѕємι~Мαđ ŠçїєŋŧιѕТ 6 · 0 0

Heck no. There are so many countries and so many different ways of governing or controlling, which ever way you want to look at it, there is no way the whole world could come to an agreement on how to govern the whole world.

2006-07-05 02:16:21 · answer #3 · answered by babybro35 6 · 0 0

immediately we stay in a closed universe so territory is an argument. If - when we make authentic tries to leave the planet and colonize something else of the image voltaic equipment or galaxy, that is when we would have an open universe and territory doesn't be an situation and shall we evaluate a one international authorities.

2016-10-14 03:36:33 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

After the next tectonic shift of the earth!
Boaz.

2006-07-05 02:13:36 · answer #5 · answered by Boaz 4 · 0 0

to many people to govern that dont agree with ideals. this is why we have war to begin with.

2006-07-05 02:14:00 · answer #6 · answered by cherriwaves 3 · 0 0

No, then there cant be no World Cup no more.

2006-07-05 02:58:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

u need to stop watching Cartoon movies.

2006-07-05 02:17:29 · answer #8 · answered by newtouch8 2 · 0 0

No, never, & I certainly hope not.

2006-07-05 02:12:30 · answer #9 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0 0

yes. unless, of course, we blow ourselves up trying.

2006-07-05 02:13:00 · answer #10 · answered by Matthew F 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers