Why just Arabs? Why not the Chinese, the Taliban, the Iranians, the North Koreans... and any body else who might mean harm, for their "connections" here? I mean, I'm a Neo-Con, but I don't really think you are. I think you're merely a misdirected Christian who is young and doesn't read much and watched a bit too much "24"? Like, I think you believe Jack Bauer is going to do the "asking" and not liberal judges. "Discriminating" doesn't bother me, neither does profiling - but to just answer some questions about terrorists? It's damn expensive to house all the Arabs to do that... and the manpower required would take forever. It's easier to trace their money moving around, remember? Personally I think we should just clear out Wyoming and give it to Hamas so they can leave Palestine. And, if we get some terrorists to question, nothing wrong with putting them in a camp for a while - that's why we have fun "Animal House" places like Abu Grahib.
But your idea of "camps" - I just love it. BIG, FAT camps where we could move small countries full of people. Let's face it, you can grow more food in Wyoming. They could have Walmart, McDonald's ... Starbuck's! Sears could manufacture Burkhas. We could move starving Africans there, too. Nobody wants Wyoming or South Dakota, and parts of Alaska. Why not just put a big fence around it, and move in anybody who gives us problems or needs a home, the way the Palestinians have no place to go but that hot desert?
And sure, we'll put your torture camp for questioning terrorists out in the back, how does that sound?
2006-07-05 01:14:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ann Coulter's Gang 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Okay. Here is how I get to prove you're full of crap.
1) I've seen some of your answers, and you are most definitely not a "neocon".
2) "Neocons" do not call themselves "neocons".
3) No "neocon" I know would advocate placing ANYONE in a camp. By the way, the only President to ever place anyone in a camp was a DEMOCRAT.
4) Give me a break. Not inciting hatred my @$$.
2006-07-05 01:02:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It seems you have developed some outrage. First, Mr. Bush has stated that our war is not with the Arabs it is only with the terrorist. Second, many of the Arabs in the US are Muslim, not Islamic (and there is a difference). Add too, many are Christian who came here to escape persecution. Second, we did this with the Japanese in WWII, and the grandchildren of that generation (us) ended up apologizing and paying restitution for the action. Third, it is illegal; it is a violation of the 14th Amendment. I think is is best that we play by our own rules, they have served us well for some 200 years now.
2006-07-05 01:03:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am thinking you are Neo, alright, but I think the second part of your classification is not Con, it's Nazi.
2006-07-05 01:04:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by kelly24592 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're not "inciting hatred"!? Thank you NEOCON for showing us your true feelings.
2006-07-05 00:52:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dr.Feelgood 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
A question is a question it’s not “what if” look up Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, it’s being done.
2006-07-05 01:08:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jessica 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Feeding trolls is counterproductive.
2006-07-05 00:51:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by night_trekker 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
than we can open a camp for stupid liars too.
2006-07-05 01:21:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nice try...actually I take that back...bad try.
2006-07-05 01:31:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by johngjordan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are disgusting!!!
2006-07-05 00:51:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋