is the players r weak by playing continuosly in the premiership matches or Ericson's failiure to exploit the talented players wat do u think......?
2006-07-03 22:40:21 · 14 answers · asked by jith v 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
ERIKSSON's stupid - his decision bringing walcott means nothing. eng have striker problem is this campaign but why bring walcott? if he isnt play
he knows much the formation isnt working since the 1st match. but he keep doing it until the Portugal match
lampard - doesnt make any sense. he's great in chelsea but this time doesn't prove it.
Ricardo is really magnificent that night and all of eng luck and wishes just go with him
ronaldo is bullshit. he really make trouble wtih eng fan. why he winks his to his team mates after rooney was sent out?
ure no more with MU mate as u wish it. u always say that ure linked to real. now u show it.and wish that real will accept u.
piss off!
2006-07-03 23:12:30 · answer #1 · answered by Jack . 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I actually liked the England team a lot: I thought they deserved a win against Portugal. Unfortunately they always lose penalty shoot outs. It's mainly a matter of bad luck that they're not in the semis, even though I never expected to win the cup. I suppose France, Germany and Argentina are just a little bit stronger than England this year.
Ericsson is a fine coach, Beckham played well, Joe Cole and Ferdinand were outstanding, Lampard and Gerrard very much OK, Aaron Lennon a revelation.
2006-07-03 22:59:03 · answer #2 · answered by eyeronick 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
England's failure was because of something that England never wished to. and that small thing which pushed them' out. but that small thing pushed Portugal in for a big event. The small thing doesn't happen every match only if score r level. You got it? It's the small thing- penalty shootouts.
And if England had to win ... then probably they would without Portugal goalkeeper Ricardo. England didn't play well in the other matches against Trinidad & Tobago, Paraguay, Sweds & Ecuador (R of 16). but if they faced another team, they will sure have a chance fo winning.
---------------------------------
Shocking:
England 1- 0 Paraguay
no England player hit a goal except the Paraguay player who wears an armband (Gammara) who took a foolish header.
Hey na shocking?
2006-07-03 23:14:25 · answer #3 · answered by DPC 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was really sad when England didn't win against Portugal, I can't think of a reason why they were like this, they had enough practice and they managed to win most of their matches but their playing was pretty weak even though the team has a lot of talented players.......
2006-07-03 22:43:24 · answer #4 · answered by N 4eva 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
England has a great team and they played very well! Each time they came near Ricardo my heart stopped! And in penalties anything can hapen and Ricardo was too good that night! Everytime we play against England, is a great game! gladly we had won. It's OK to loose with great teams, but i confess that to win is better!
2006-07-03 22:54:12 · answer #5 · answered by Ana Sofia PORTUGAL 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the players have enough rest before the finals...may be they didn't click with each other quite so well...and ..Yes..I agree ..Sven failed to exploit the best, out of the some very talented players....it was really a sad thing...
2006-07-03 22:53:51 · answer #6 · answered by khutswe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
feels gr8 that England is out
the players are not that good to win the world cup
2006-07-03 22:45:47 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I felt sick in my stomach when that happened. Nevertheless I thought they deserved to lose for playing so lamely.
2006-07-03 22:45:20 · answer #8 · answered by melodyling 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Their HUGE ego got in the way of their "success"
2006-07-03 23:01:27 · answer #9 · answered by callmemisscutie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say they deserve to lose because they played poorly, and go france!!!
2006-07-03 22:52:07 · answer #10 · answered by maxtheaxe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋