1. Oil
2. The Bush administration's failure to locate O Bin Laden, and the consequent need to distract attention from that failure
3. The restoration of the US Dollar as reserve currency for trading of Oil
4. The arbitrary desire of the Bush administration to act for the Iraqi people, without sufficient backing from the latter, in replacing the Hussain regime
5. Stimulation of the US Economy, by having lucrative contracts awarded to American industry in the post-"liberation" phase
2006-07-03 20:34:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by sndsouza 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Outside of Afghanistan, Iraq is the one country that we had legal standing to attack. Saddam repeatedly violated the treaty that ended the Persian Gulf War, thus negating that treaty.
2. We needed to keep the initiative and continue to take the fight to the enemy. Without this second front in the War on Terror, the rest of the terrorist supporting regimes would not take the war seriously. Everyone knew we were going into Afghanistan, and now least we forget, we don't need to go into Libya. The good colonel turned over all of his WMD programs and renounced his ties to terrorists without firing a shot.
3. Saddam's WMD programs. We know they existed. He used them against the Kurds in '88. What was being inspected in the '90's during the Clinton administration? Why did Clinton order the largest air strike in history against Iraq?
4. Liberation of the Iraqi people.
5. Stabilization of the area. Even the other Arab countries were afraid of Saddam, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait.
PS: If we went in because of oil, why are paying over $3.00 a gallon for oil? Wouldn't it be smarter to increase production of oil to make the price drop and make voters happy? For most of you who answered this question, try looking at the facts, use your head and stop simply repeating what you hear on the news. We are not the bad guys in this war.
2006-07-04 06:56:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Mad Lasher 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do the 20,000 Kurdish women, children and old men count as one reason or 20,000 reasons...let's say it counts as one.
2. the potential threat of WMD...which we never found, but had rumors of trucks leaving for Syria just before the war.
3. to finish what we started in the 1st Bush administration, after Saddam's war of aggression against Kuwait.
4. Knee jerk reaction after 9/11, we had to attack someone....i didn't say this was a good reason, but its true.
5. and the number 5 reason we attacked, we wanted to protect the oil from, among others, the Russians/Chinese.
2006-07-04 03:36:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. To control oil produciton in teh world
2. Show the world that the US can do it
3. establish a pax americana int eregion
4. undermine the status quo of the world following the fall of the the Soviet Union, teh growing weakness of the UN
5. rewrite history plus as a payback for 9/11
2006-07-04 03:30:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by samydan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
oil oil oil oil and to eventually have a military base in Iraq.
at some future time there will be a northern Iraq and a souther Iraq. the U.S. will have a military base in Southern Iraq near the sea ports. watch your results and read about whats going on over there between the the two different religios factions.
BUSH WANTED TO GET HIS NAME IN THE HISTORY BOOKS
2006-07-11 01:56:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by whitebuffalorider 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
1: To remove Saddam Hussain from power
2: To destroy WMD
3: To remove the threats of human rights violations regarding the torture of his people.
4: To invade territory which, like afganistan is under al-quada/taliban influence
5: To begin a conquest to stabilise a region which is unstabilised.
2006-07-04 20:36:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by lee p 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
#1 George Bush #2 George Bush #3George Bush #4 George Bush #5 George Bush
2006-07-04 12:08:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Terrorist threat-- Weapons of Mass Destruction
2. Oil
3. The diminishing value of the U.S. currency over that of Euros currency
4. Economic boost
5. "Us first instead of them" ploy attacks to avoid war on our homeland.
2006-07-04 03:29:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Dubya Wanted to
2. Dubya was determined to attack Iraq
3. Dubya wouldn't give in
4. Dubya made sure he got his way
5. Dubya is the anti-christ
2006-07-04 03:23:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chad 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
DUbya is crazy (and has major shares in the number 1 US milatry arms supplier)
2006-07-04 03:27:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by icedragon1420 2
·
0⤊
0⤋