2006-07-03 20:14:23 · 10 answers · asked by roly jazz 2 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
Egypt
2006-07-03 20:22:33 · answer #1 · answered by karmy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
South Africa
2006-07-04 03:59:27 · answer #2 · answered by dipak 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
South Africa?
2006-07-04 03:21:09 · answer #3 · answered by bitterswtchocolate 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually any country with developed tourist industry and experience in hosting major event would do.
I can not believe people having this prejudice against holding a tournament in Africa, but somehow it does not stop hordes of European tourists from coming to Egypt, Tunisia or South African vacation resorts all year long.
Countries who definitely fit to host WC and actually fit better then some South American nations are also Morocco, Kenya, Tanzania, Namibia and may be even Cameroon
2006-07-04 05:55:47 · answer #4 · answered by Nick G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd go for South Africa, Egypt, Tinisia, Libya, Algeria or Morocco. I would not go to any other country because they are too poor. Also, Africa boasts spectacular scenery and wildlife, and it wouldn't be a good idea to destroy it in order to build football pitches. Building some in the middle of the Sahara would be a good idea, as not much wildlife or people live there.
2006-07-04 04:49:50 · answer #5 · answered by kekkufellu from Malta 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
South Africa. It's a nice country!
2006-07-04 06:32:52 · answer #6 · answered by r3d d3vil 05 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cameroon or South Africa.
2006-07-04 03:36:39 · answer #7 · answered by sam 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
South Africa. I think they would have the financial resources...
2006-07-04 03:41:06 · answer #8 · answered by * 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ethiopia.
Having the world's eye turned to this country would help fighting against starvation, HIV/AIDS.
Take a minute and visit http://www.actionaid.org
2006-07-04 03:54:29 · answer #9 · answered by Kicky 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cameroon
2006-07-04 03:32:39 · answer #10 · answered by musldcok4ladiz 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋