Can the have-nots become haves without getting angry first?

Answer 1

No, they have to buck up and fight back. Complacency is their worst enemy.

Answer 2

Getting angry is a big obstacle in becoming a Have. The Have-nots tend to play "victim" and blame other people for their problems. They expect hand-outs and other help. This is a dead-end.

The Have-nots have to start at the beginning and just work themselves out of it. That's the only way to success.

Answer 3

no. no change worthy of attention have been brought about in this world without someone getting angry first. but the crucial factor here is that, you must get angry at the 'situation' not the so-called 'haves'. for example, the violence in france which was anger against 'haves' only resulted in the have nots being more sidelined socially. hence the poor or the have-nots should be angry at their situation and correct it by means peaceful (mahathma gandhi's sathyagraha and non- cooperation movements)

Answer 4

In general, "have-nots" can improve their chances of becoming "haves" if they band together. For example, if extended families live together instead of in separate housing, they can save on living expenses, leaving them with more money to save to improve their situation.

In the U.S. at least, it is possible to improve one's economic situation, but it is very hard to do so without help from someone. It's better to get help from one's own family than to wait for the government to help.

Answer 5

Id depends on if your definition of "anger" and my definition of "dissatisfaction" are the same. I personally don't think getting angry would be the same as simply taking initiative.

Answer 6

no way society is not set up like that, if they could, the silience would be unbearable.