2006-07-03 17:25:02 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
they wont nessceraily be in the court room. in a case like that, they will more than likly be sworn to testimony per affidavit. meaning they will write it all down and have the statement read before the court
2006-07-03 17:30:15 · answer #1 · answered by meld1707 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends on what they have to say and how much time has been allowed for the trial. A court isn't listen to 100 witness say the same thing over and over again.
2006-07-03 17:48:01 · answer #2 · answered by Carl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if they are all just character witnesses, no way. or if they are alot of overlapping knowledge, no way. if each and every person really has something unique to add to the case, then just maybe they might consider it for a moment before probably saying no.
2006-07-03 17:31:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because it would be a waste of tax payers money. just pick out the top witnesses. the ones with the strongest evidence.
2006-07-03 17:31:52 · answer #4 · answered by angel 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the courts consider that redundant (same thing over and over) so they'll ask you to whittle it down to just so many. Start thinking of who you'd want to stand up for you now.
2006-07-03 17:30:04 · answer #5 · answered by Derek W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but maybe a million.
2006-07-03 17:27:01 · answer #6 · answered by Made in America 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hell no...maybe if u said plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
2006-07-03 18:17:24 · answer #7 · answered by Love Exists? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are they all virgins?
2006-07-03 17:28:02 · answer #8 · answered by gnomes31 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋