Is it legal for universities to restrict the sale of properties near their campus to faculty/staff?

Question

Some houses near Stanford are restricted for sale only to faculty and high level staff. I would think this would violate the fair housing requirements.

Here is an example listing that has this restriction. You may need to register to see it:

http://www.ziprealty.com/buy_a_home/logged_in/search/home_detail.jsp?listing_num=638342&page=1&property_type=SFR&mls=mls_ca_ba&cKey=v5d4kpcw&source=CAREIL

Answer 1

The houses in question are on Stanford land. Hence, Stanford can impose rules on who lives in them. Note that if you buy one of these houses, you do not get a fee simple title: you get a leasehold -- Stanford retains ownership of the land.

Answer 2

A better question would be why it wouldn't be legal.

A private entity can sell its property to whomever it chooses so long as it does not do so with a specifically prohibited discriminatory intent. That is, the could not refuse to sell their houses to people based on race but they can sell them based on employment.

As much as many people of both the left and right in this country would prefer that we all be slaves of the government the fact is that this is a free country.

Answer 3

Does Standford own the houses? If they are the original property owners, the school may be able to transfer them to staff and call it a perk of working there. If they aren't the owners of the properties in question, sounds like market interference. How can they stipulate who buys what and where?

How did you get this information?

Answer 4

Your important hurdle lies interior the reality the human physique can circulate 3 days without water, so confident generally absent a scientific circumstance a student is in a place to circulate without water for a term of four hours, on good the reality it’s a private corporation leaves you little recourse

Answer 5

Seems illegal to me!