English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is anyone else upset that everyone is using 9-11 to do whatever they want. Whenever a person asks a question about war the warmongers always referrence 9-11. I feel it is a shame that the people that died are nothing more to these people than an excuse to take more lives.

2006-07-03 15:41:11 · 13 answers · asked by neveroutnumbered 4 in Politics & Government Politics

I am not saying to live and let live. But the fact of the matter is you can't just keep starting wars. The war with Afghanistan was justified by 9-11 but that wasn't the reasoning for entering Iraq. The reason for Iraq was WMDs that weren't found it was only after this that 9-11 got thrown around.

2006-07-03 15:51:03 · update #1

13 answers

I've been sick of it since the 04 elections. Tired of the president using it for his own agenda, and it pisses me off that all these people buy that bull...

2006-07-03 15:51:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

The problem with the war in Iraq was George Bush just decided he wanted to "do something" about Iraq and start a war. While Saddam Hussein kind of asked for world-wide intervention in some ways by the way he treated many of his country's minorities, I feel the war on Iraq was started on the basis of a lie. I remember hearing so many stories about weapons of mass destruction. The UN even sent in weapons experts to see if there were any, but nobody found any weapons of mass destruction - even to this day. I think there is a more obvious reason for causing this war on Iraq: oil supply.

2006-07-03 16:02:50 · answer #2 · answered by Angela B 4 · 0 0

Republicans did not spend a penny investigating Clinton. Ken Starr became named a particular prosecutor, after Janet Reno requested the three choose panel to nominate him in 1994 on the time, there became a democratic majority contained in the domicile and Senate. 2. once appointed, the in straight forward words individual who might want to get rid of Ken Starr as particular prosecutor, became the lawyer wide-spread, janet reno. 3. The FBI became the lead organization for the 9/11 analyze, with help from all different authorities organizations. the fee of that analyze became pretty a lot 1000000000 money. Your complicated the 9/11 committee, which wasn';t there to inspect 9/11, yet to make options on a thanks to maintain away from yet another 9/11

2016-11-30 06:12:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I hate when people use 9/11 as an excuse just to get things that have no need to be used. The fact that we go hit is bad enough but to tarnish the memories of the people who died there just for some crappy thing such as a new security plan that says if you say bomb one time you go to jail is just unexcuse able, if you want to start a war that brings down a Islamofacist regime, go full speed ahead.

2006-07-03 17:08:56 · answer #4 · answered by Saint 3 · 0 0

So what you are saying is that you think we just live and let live, like we did on 9/10? We did that after the baracks bombings, the tower bombings, and the attack on the U.S.S. Cole. That is why 9/11 is brought up every time Warmongers as you call them talk about why we are at war.

2006-07-03 15:47:56 · answer #5 · answered by Bill S 3 · 0 0

You know, considering what 9/11 did to the United States as a whole, I think people have a lot more right to ask, question, do, and, yes, resent more than the yrs. before. Overall - I don't relish war, but I do think 9/11 gave us ample reason to go to war.

2006-07-03 15:47:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Saddam was much like the guy who points a toy gun at a cop and gets shot. You don't string up the cop for firing based on a reasonable belief, just as we don't string up all the Democrats who saw the same intel as Bush did and reached the same conclusions before they voted for the war.

Referring to 911 is unavoidable inasmuch as it changed the world so much. We could not afford the possiblity that Saddam, who wanted the world to think he had WMDs, actually had them and could hand them to terrorists to plant in NYC subways.

The references are valid in light of the new world we live in, whether you want to hear that or not.

2006-07-03 16:47:54 · answer #7 · answered by JSKingston 2 · 0 0

Perhaps if you had lost your wife and daughter on that tragic day, you would also want revenge. The enemies of democracy and America, see thinkers like you as weak. Terrorists respect strength, the meek are beheaded or used. Turning the other cheek is a Christian thing, it does not work on people who are taught by the Mullahs from childhood, that killing unbelievers will build your path to heaven. Become a Muslim, a radical Muslim, that way you may start to understand why people continue to fear.

2006-07-03 15:56:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, absolutely. And more so, I believe that 9/11 was not actually the work of foreign terrorists, but instead it was likely the work of the government. There is so much evidence that points to this, and if you have the time, watch this documentary: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=9%2F11+loose+change&pr=goog-sl

If the whole world country knew this, I could easily see a revolution starting.

2006-07-03 15:50:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Get use to it; 9/11 is a watershed event in US history, and, like the Kennedy assassination, will be discussed to exhaustion until this generation passes from the earth.

2006-07-03 15:47:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers