Or they really the opposite. Lets see how nice they can be . Most will avoid this question. Watch.
2006-07-03 14:57:00 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As long as the community is gated, the fun is behind closed office doors with prostitutes and young boys, and by "caring", you mean tax cuts and guns and training for every crazy religious group that says they will fight communism for them.....
Sure, they are loads of fun. Hot loads, Hollow Point loads, explosive loads, and spent uranium loads.
2006-07-03 15:05:40 · answer #1 · answered by auntiegrav 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes we are. Very much so... It's funny though... Most of you Libs who call us "neo-cons" can't define the term and won't even TRY to discover its meaning. Good answers, Guys. We ARE fun, huh...? I love your stuff, "T.T."... Keep that up. I'm a fan. I don't think we've "avoided" the question either. But that won't matter. Libs never put their money or their lives where their mouths are. I'd like to see a few of them EARN their voting and free-speech PRIVILEDGES. My guess is that most couldn't pull enough weight to buy the right to breathe the AIR they wastefully consume. That air alone is an act of generosity on our part. Hahaha!!!
2006-07-05 08:34:13 · answer #2 · answered by the_rugged_individual 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ye bet your asss, dad. We are the ones you see in droves, motorcycling for cancer cures, scholarships and Toys for Tots. We take Christmas to old folks homes and do a host of other good works that never sees the front page of the Liberal press
2006-07-03 22:09:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do people who use the term "neocon" insist on asking loaded questions. You don't want an answer, you just want a chance to spew your crap. At least try and get creative about it. My advice, get off the left wing web sites and you might actually learn something.
2006-07-03 22:10:06 · answer #4 · answered by Nuke Lefties 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course.
Anyone that would need to use the term "neo-con" must be a great person to be around, as well.
2006-07-03 22:00:39 · answer #5 · answered by SHOOTER586 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've never run into one who you would consider someone who you would want to be around for long as they need to spew Fox dogma at regular intervals. I wish there were enough Ann Coulters to go around for them all to share in her bodacious bounty. No wait, she is really an anorexic man. My bad.
2006-07-07 01:03:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course we are. Now let's see you ask a question without name calling.
2006-07-04 17:49:26 · answer #7 · answered by trinitytough 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes...thanks for the compliment. I am a nice person, just a realist, which means I don't always see the world as nice.
2006-07-03 22:20:19 · answer #8 · answered by loubean 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that's sarcasm. If wars for a foreign nation and open borders are "fun" then yes, they are.
2006-07-03 22:02:03 · answer #9 · answered by copperhead9590 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We're a hoot! Where's my beer?! When I get done with it I'm gonna recycle the can! Yahoooooooooooooo!!!!!!
2006-07-03 22:04:30 · answer #10 · answered by Mr. Boof 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋