Simple, God created it.
2006-07-03 13:27:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by dewcoons 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
life began on earth with the big bang thory idea. There are tiny little particals in space that collided and spawned the growth of the universe (which is still growing). One planet, called Earth, was a boiling planet that cooled enough to let the heat combine with the cooler water that had formed to create single celled life forms. These life forms grew into two celled, then three, then on and on untill it created bacteria. that bacteria formed into things like planktin followed by bigger things. Depinding on where on Earth that particular single celled organism was, it formed a little different then the others. Some became plants and trees. Some became fish and reptiles. Some became birds. some became humans and animals....simple enough
2006-07-03 13:34:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Trevor P 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The reason why you think you don't get really good answers is because it is a very controversal subject to discuss therefore you will receive the opinion of many and you might not be open to the answers you are given. Instead of trying to get the answer to your question, enjoy life as you know it. You can consider yourself "first life created" because your life is the only life you know and you can't live the life of another person because if you did then it wouldn't be you, right.
Read the last sentence of your comment "because some form of life had to be there to begin with" - the creation of life can begin with you because you are here.....
2006-07-03 16:54:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know where you get your informaton from. The very, very first life form (at time of creation) didn't have some form of life to begin with. Every living thing that requires life came into being in an instant, it didn't come from a seed. The intelligent life form we call God is the form from which all life came from, he was the beginning as far as lefe is concerned. If you can't understand that, then you have a problem.
2006-07-03 13:48:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by ZORRO 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The origin of life remains very much a mystery, but biochemists have learned about how primitive nucleic acids, amino acids and other building blocks of life could have formed and organized themselves into selfreplicating, self-sustaining units, laying the foundation for cellular biochemistry. Astrochemical analyses hint that quantities of these compounds might have originated in space and fallen to earth in comets, a scenario that may solve the problem of how those constituents arose under the conditions that prevailed when our planet was young. Creationists sometimes try to invalidate all of evolution by pointing to science’s current inability to explain the origin of life. But even if life on earth turned out to have a nonevolutionary origin (for instance, if aliens introduced the first cells billions of years ago), evolution since then would be robustly confirmed by countless microevolutionary and macroevolutionary studies.
Creationists say that mathematically, it is inconceivable that anything as complex as a protein, let alone a living cell or a human, could spring up by chance. Chance plays a part in evolution (for example, in the random mutations that can give rise to new traits), but evolution does not depend on chance to create organisms, proteins or other entities. Quite the opposite: natural selection, the principal known mechanism of evolution, harnesses nonrandom change by preserving “desirable” (adaptive) features and eliminating “undesirable” (nonadaptive) ones. As long as the forces of selection stay constant, natural selection can push evolution in one direction and produce sophisticated structures in surprisingly short times. As an analogy, consider the 13-letter sequence “TOBEORNOTTOBE.” Those hypothetical million monkeys, each pecking out one phrase a second, could take as long as 78,800 years to find it among the 2613 sequences of that length. But in the 1980s Richard Hardison of Glendale College wrote a computer program that generated phrases randomly while preserving the positions of individual letters that happened to be correctly placed (in effect, selecting for phrases more like Ham let’s). On average, the program re-created the phrase in just 336 iterations, less than 90 seconds. Even more amazing, it could reconstruct Shakespeare’s entire play in just four and a half days.
Creationists argue that The Second Law of Thermodynamics says that systems must become more disordered over time. Living cells therefore could not have evolved from inanimate chemicals, and multicellular life could not have evolved from protozoa.
This argument derives from a misunderstanding of the Second Law. If it were valid, mineral crystals and snowflakes would also be impossible, because they, too, are complex structures that form spontaneously from disordered parts. The Second Law actually states that the total entropy of a closed system (one that no energy or matter leaves or enters) cannot decrease. Entropy is a physical concept often casually described as disorder, but it differs significantly from the conversational use of the word. More important, however, the Second Law permits parts of a system to decrease in entropy as long as other parts experience an offsetting increase. Thus, our planet as a whole can grow more complex because the sun pours heat and light onto it, and the greater entropy associated with the sun’s nuclear fusion more than rebalances the scales. Simple organisms can fuel their rise toward complexity by consuming other forms of life and nonliving materials.
2006-07-03 13:27:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mac Momma 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one knows. We have only one supposed record of an observation, that is the creation account in Genesis chapter 1. How that could have happened , no one knows. Most scientist do not believe that account, but they have no alternative with evidence. The big bang and evolution is the best hypothesis scientist can come up with. But they can not support it with evidence. As it stands-God created the heavens and the earth and all that are in them is. That record stands until it can be proved wrong, or some other idea can be sufficiently supported.
2006-07-03 13:38:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can't say for sure. It was certainly as small as, but not as sophisticated as the single-celled life forms that cover the planet now. There is some evidence that it's a lot like the archea bacteria that exists in high tempurature sea vents and substrata. This bacteria is the most populous living thing on the planet.
2006-07-03 13:36:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by l00kiehereu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to the bible God has no beginning and no end. The book of Genesis says the very first thing he created was his son Jesus and that together they went on to create everything else including the physical creation, like the stars and the planets ,earth and everything on it.
2006-07-03 13:34:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cadetphoenix 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
In your question you say "some form of life had to be there to begin with" so you just answered your question. The only answer you will accept is that Life Always Existed, according to your own logic.
2006-07-03 13:43:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the beginning was God and he created the heavens and the earth and animals and birds and man. Adam was the first we know about.
2006-07-03 13:30:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
God has been here from the beginning, he created the earth and all that is on it, he created life ....
2006-07-03 13:36:03
·
answer #11
·
answered by BASKETBALL_playHer 2
·
0⤊
0⤋