2006-07-03 10:47:04 · 9 answers · asked by bumpocooper 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
He'd be a Democrat. That was the party of the South in antebellum America and it was the party that exploited the bourgeousie to create a stronger upper crust.
But then, Democrats haven't changed a lot. They just have better PR.
2006-07-03 10:52:42 · answer #1 · answered by yellow_jellybeans_rock 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Definitely Democrat.....
2006-07-03 19:43:22 · answer #2 · answered by star 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Democrat, at that time the Democrats were the more conservative of the parties.
2006-07-03 17:56:58 · answer #3 · answered by Who cares 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would be the guy who fed & watered the horse & dogs.
You needed more than a corrupt publicity department to get on in those days.
2006-07-03 18:11:25 · answer #4 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Democrats were conservative then so I believe he would have been one.
2006-07-03 18:57:48 · answer #5 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TEXAS WAS A DEMOCRATIC STATE. WAS.
I CAN'T IMAGINE DUBYA BEING PRES DURING THOSE YEARS THOUGH
2006-07-03 18:10:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not sure what party he'd belong to, but he'd be a moron in any century.
2006-07-03 17:50:57 · answer #7 · answered by kcsilverlining77 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would be dead, coz someone would have shot that idiot.
2006-07-05 13:36:41 · answer #8 · answered by D. D. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think he'd be drunk, drivin that wagon all crazy... :-)
ditching his civil war service... :-)
2006-07-03 18:08:22 · answer #9 · answered by truthyness 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋