2006-07-03 09:43:09 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Some still do. Some always have. Some always will. He gets popular everytime he makes a movie/documentary then most ppl move on to other things as its popularity dies down.
2006-07-10 08:49:23 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The only Michael Moore has been proven to be is a glutton for a high-caloric diet. I think the best way to resolve the Iraq situation is to send him there and have him eat all the insurgent's food supply. Moreover, if we forbid him from showering, in the sweltering heat that is the Middle East, his stench may force peace between the Israelis and Palestinians.
Just a thought.
2006-07-03 09:50:57 · answer #2 · answered by lawless 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because he asks the tough questions Republicans don't like him asking. He is an important part of our democracy. He questions the govenment and brings up real issues. Without Michael Moore and the Democrats, this country would be run like the blind leading the blind. Thank God for Moore and the Demos!
2006-07-03 09:49:16 · answer #3 · answered by Dan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was not a big fan of Fahrenheit 9/11 but Bowling for Columbine was really good. Speaking of Bowling for Columbine, that whole tragedy happen before 9/11 and remember when Rice and Chaney told you on TV that no one could have imaged that someone would use planes to fly them into buildings. Well they found plans from those boys in Columbine showing what a good idea they thought it would be to fly planes into building in major city's. If teenagers thought this up why couldn't the government. Something about that never made sense to me. Why would they lie about that.
2006-07-03 10:00:37 · answer #4 · answered by DEEJay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right now. Right this minute. Moore is in the process of being sued into bankruptcy because of the lies he has told. He has simply libeled too many people and these people have an open and shut case against him for enormous sums of money.
He's finished.
2006-07-03 09:49:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is a filmmaker of fictional documentories. That doesn't make him a fraud, just a showman. Sort a modern P T Barnum. And why people listent to him politically is beyond me, but I never went to actors for my political views any way. Including Ronnie.
2006-07-03 09:48:57 · answer #6 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heck no! Just the opposite. PS you can't claim someone is a fraud just because you don't like his opinions. He's pretty accurate and proves most of his points quite well.
2006-07-03 11:27:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he has and an arrogant jerk as well. Those who give him any notice at all need "evidence" to support their beliefs and he does that. Whether or not he's a fraud means nothing to these people.
2006-07-03 09:49:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amen.
Like most Hollywood liberals he has no formal education and no real life experience. Still he feels that he is equipped to tackle the issues.
If this turd of a man speaks for you, you are undereducated.
2006-07-03 09:51:51 · answer #9 · answered by Old Money 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not anymore the Viagra Rush. He is a whiffy with his stiffy maybe if he got off of the drugs he would not be impotant.
2006-07-03 09:48:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋