English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

He probably got drunk, passed out and woke up 2 days later, with his *** sore and a naked man lting next to him, that was (in the gay community) a total bear.

2006-07-03 09:49:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your question is seditious. This is a rumor with no basis in fact and is an excellent example, Yahoo! Answers community, of the idea of "guilty until proven innocent" as a political tool by the intellectually challenged.

Name-calling directed at our elected officials is subversive and undermines our country, whether directed at Democrat or Republican. These were chosen by our system of government and YOU DON'T LIKE IT.

Tough. Some of us are U.S.A. citizen first, support our country, even as we disagree and dissent, or even protest. I as a Democrat am sick and tired of this whining and lying and constant undermining that is done against our country. How many of you Republicans are going to get behind and support the Democrats who are speaking up against this kind of seditious behavior? How many will speak up against the same kind of behavior when directed against Democrats? Even if Former First Lady Hilliary Clinton wins? (Not my first choice, but I would throw my weight behind any candidate that the majority chooses. That's our strength.)

To answer your question directly: No, there is not proof he had such an experience and it shows your extreme prejudice against gays that you would say such a thing. Second, the psychiatric term you used has nothing to do with any of President Bush's behavior, and shows a very poor understanding of psychology and illustrates how little thought you put into your question.

Yes, you have free speech.

So do we. I just answered you as was my right. Hopefully a lot of Democrats and Republicans will do the same.

Your behavior is a shame to whatever country you come from.

2006-07-03 16:28:29 · answer #2 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 0 0

Anyone reading Karl Rove's autobiography will read his description of the day he met GWB. In that desription of GWB Rove practically raves about how sexy he thinks the little dick is. I'm paraphrashing but it was basically "Rove says the first time he saw this son come in from Harvard, he thought, what an extraordinary-looking person, dynamic-looking. Here was George W. Bush coming in with his leather fighter jacket, chewing gum, being casual and cool, the epitome of the handsome, intriguing, charismatic collegiate. And here was Karl Rove, just the opposite: the nerd, the intellectual, the student of history. And he really saw in George Bush everything he wasn't. They were perfect complements to each other: the nerd who understood the mechanics of a campaign, and this jock, this extraordinarily charismatic young man who understood the dynamic of personal appeal in the campaign. "

I dunno...wink... seems kinda gay to me. (not that there's anything wrong with that!)

2006-07-04 15:53:00 · answer #3 · answered by Lee 4 · 1 0

you know i came through this picture of bush during a speech he was giving at the bohemian grove ( known for it's gay community)
and he was hugging the most famous gay porn star.
he might be gay but i gotta do more research on that one before saying any thing wrong!!!
and between politicians being GAY is a huge deal it will destroy their political life if discovered so they have to make it clear that they are against it!!

2006-07-03 22:31:46 · answer #4 · answered by /\ 3 · 0 0

ok slow down there. one has nothing to do with the other. i sugest you ask santa for a dictionary for x-mas.

2006-07-03 16:22:09 · answer #5 · answered by ~*~ Flutterby ~*~ 4 · 0 0

You are intellectually bereft.

2006-07-03 16:23:14 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers