2006-07-03 08:52:35 · 7 answers · asked by LILY111 1 in Travel ➔ United States ➔ Other - United States
I've lived in both and liked them both. Both are pretty sophisticated, ethnically diverse, and lots of great places to walk. Minneapolis housing is a bit more reasonable. Gets colder in the winter and hotter in the summer in Minneapolis.
Boston: you can drive 3 hours one way you're in the mountains, another way and your on the beach.
Mpls: Drive three hours and you're in Duluth...which is nice.
2006-07-03 17:11:01 · answer #1 · answered by Lemme_show_ya 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Minneapolis. The people are soo friendly. Although I do like the Boston accents.
2006-07-10 13:49:04 · answer #2 · answered by mlm1975 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
minneapolis. i lived in boston for 3 years. anywhere would be better than boston. the people there are absolutely horrible.
2006-07-03 15:56:02 · answer #3 · answered by sabrewulf01 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Boston...Boston may be a HUGE city, but it has a lot of good benefits...The jobs are great, the laws are splendid(unless your a high-time criminal), and is one of the safest cities in the U.S. Notice i stated ONE OF...there are several safe cities in the U.S., bosten is just great! If you were to move to one of those cities, i would suggest Bosten...thanks!
2006-07-03 16:02:52 · answer #4 · answered by mcpimp_2010 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are both cold. i don't think either. but i like the Red Sox better than the Twins so i guess if i HAD to choose, Boston.
2006-07-03 15:56:29 · answer #5 · answered by kiddo shorty 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
boston cuz of its history
2006-07-03 15:56:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For what?? To live or to visit??
2006-07-03 15:59:27 · answer #7 · answered by Penguin Gal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋