English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

england where robbed again

2006-07-03 06:24:46 · 18 answers · asked by CHURCHBELLROPE 2 in Sports Football FIFA World Cup (TM)

18 answers

i dont think they should allow him back in england period. he a cheat and whats worse he suppose to be a friend of wayne's. he a absolute ****

2006-07-03 06:27:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

England always loses against Portugal. Of the last 11 matches, England only won one! Yes, one!!!. Ronald will be best player in the world in the next couple of years. What a stupid question if Ronaldo should be allowed to play in England again... Of course, he's the best player playing in England today. And by the way, England's coach said red card was deserved.

2006-07-03 06:44:03 · answer #2 · answered by California 1 · 0 0

A record from the media an afternoon after ECB's statement. "contemporary comments advise that there have been a sighting of the Superman flying throughout the time of the Thames. The blue and purple attires were lengthy previous although. His garbs were of white color, with a huge 'S' emblazoned on it. some eye-witnesses who were crossing the Westminster suggested that this Superman had blond hairs. A source in ECB stated that it will be Shane 'Superman' Warne, who's in England to rescue England from an drawing close disaster. And the tight-lipped ECB reputable did not exhibit what that disaster is going to be. even though it really is youngster's play to wager that they are searching ahead to a 5-0 drubbing through the Aussies contained in the Ashes"

2016-11-05 21:15:17 · answer #3 · answered by valderrama 4 · 0 0

England underachieved, because they didn't play true English soccer as we see every weekend in the English Premier League. Instead they played the way Sven, a tactical dictator whose influence is Italian soccer, organized them. England played like an Italian team. They will never play like Linnekar's generation, or Keegan's before that. Same for Argentina, Mexico, Brazil, Portugal and formerly France (I say formerly because it's Zidane who is taking charge on the field, not a tactical dictator like Domenic). None played true to their spirit or style (Argentina hasn't since 1994, nor has Brazil since then either).

Robbed, No. That the English federation chose the wrong coach and put their back on English style and English coaches, feeling that a non-English based coach could take them to the top, yes (this is not a xenophobic comment. I'm an American!! It's what I observe, that's all). It blew up in the Euro Cup in 2004, and no in the WC in 2006.

2006-07-03 06:38:17 · answer #4 · answered by John 3 · 0 0

Cheat? How did he cheat? And why shouldn't he be allowed to play in England? He is a sportsman and your nation comes above all else!! That is what the world cup is about. England played well but in the end the best team won, and in this case it wasn't England but Portugal that was the best team.

2006-07-03 06:34:46 · answer #5 · answered by aniski7 4 · 0 0

My goodness!! Get over it!!!! How did he cheat? and why shouldn't he play in England again? This is the World Cup. It's the players playing for their couuntry and showing their patriotism!! This has nothing to do with where they play before or after the world cup. I saw the game from beginning to end, England did not play to their full potential, that's why they lost! Portugal fought tooth and nail to be where they are and noone can disagree with that. It's hard to cheat when everyone is staring at you!

2006-07-03 08:15:37 · answer #6 · answered by blu441980 2 · 0 0

Who the hell told you C. Ronaldo cheated?

Well, Sven-GoranErikkson is an a*sh**e. He s**k*. Why didn't he play Theo Walcott? Crouch shouldn't have been on the team at all. You can't win with a 4-5-1 formation. Rooney is not great enough to be a lone forward! He needed a partner.
With the formation Eng wouldn't lose but draw and it took moments of magic by Beckham to win two boring games. He couldn't do it in the last game and though Eng defended, they coudn't score and lost on penalties due to f**k**g frank lampard!

Sorry for the language, but I had to use them!

2006-07-03 06:34:43 · answer #7 · answered by Patrick Mondal 3 · 0 0

How the hell did Ronaldo cheat?

Ask Sven he cost the World Cup for England with Walcott and skeleton Crouch. He should have brought Defoe and Ashton. "England was robbed" take the loss and get some balls.

2006-07-03 06:27:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

be allowed to play in england again? how xenophobic are you? england didn't underachieve because they are not that good in the first place anyway just take a look at the qualifying games they played and the five games in the world cup, the only team that scraped through the same way was france and they at least have potential

2006-07-03 07:00:15 · answer #9 · answered by donniedarkside 3 · 0 0

Underachieve.Of course they did.But then again they have been doing that ever since 1966.Or so the English media have been telling everyone.Personally I think they were bloody lucky to reach the quarter finals the way they were playing.
And remind me again how exactly how Ronaldo cheated.Oh thats right he scored his penalty when Robinson wasnt looking.LMAO.

2006-07-03 06:31:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Engalnd could not score in the penalty kicks, and Ronaldo will play for Manchester United, just like he has done in the past years.

2006-07-03 06:27:50 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers