English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

well to say..wat people think life is the one v r living..since, v knw dat life wud be this and death is dis...the pain is dis and the relief is dis..this the feeling which actually we feel..but the names r given by someone who had taught us..its either ur mom or ur dad or ur teacher..but what i ask is a simple question..does what v actually feel is dat what actually it is on this universe..u never knw u may b having the life living next to ya?..but for ur naked eye and according to ur science ..it may not be life?..all becoz v r all addicted to the general science or theology dat v have been taught..y dnt think of any possibility of this..y dnt u think of the evolutionary theory of darwin..dat since v c like dis..and wat v see is characterised by someone to be dat..v believe that what v c is dat...but exactly no one knows what it is..

2006-07-03 05:37:21 · 18 answers · asked by shirish_maroju 2 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

18 answers

It's all about perception!

Your wording and formulation of this question suggest that you do your best to sound 'politically correct' but in the end I highly doubt if you'll be able to get the REAL answer you're looking for.

Good luck!

2006-07-03 05:40:32 · answer #1 · answered by Roland 6 · 2 0

I think what you are TRYING to say is that language and culture defines a limited spectrum of definitions and possible statements. I suggest you research the language complexity formula. I am pretty sure you are a highschool student trying to be clever. While I must applaud your attempt to be intuitive... u must realize that without these words you have been taught... u would never have developed the areas of the brain you would need to think of this concept you have here. What you are inferring is, if what I see is blue how do we know that you don't see red but call it blue? Yea same dillema capable of driving anyone silly enough to contemplate for too long into madness. But when I was in highschool I wrote this and I guess was once somewhere.. in some sense... at ur level of intuition and cognition.

Light of Confussion

Sometimes I'm me
But other times, I'm him
See there is two parts to thee
Much of which is not meant to see
Yet there I am, he who never is
He who will never be
Anything more or less then
The ultimate of all unknown

My words often confuse
Leaving me behind
Leaving me alone
Yet my desires are true to the same
I have none today
Yet tomorrow is yesterday
And today tomorrow
So how can one judge

My own self I hold as a vessel
Of one that has purpose not here
But that is immeasurable there
See all my method
Is of pure observation
Of how this world has and will be
With no concern of what is
For the now is a reflection of such a degree

To now provide explanation
Would be to provide none
What I am now is not what is now
Yet what I was I was
What I was may be again
And all others will be the same
For time has never been true
But merely a way of recession

or this 1

Answers Never Be True

What is in front of you?
Have you been there before?
Or is before what will be?
Can you tell anymore?

What is behind you?
Is it now what it was?
Is past really past?
Or have our lives been a buzz?

What is beneath you?
Can you feel what is there?
Do you know if it is?
Will it change by next glare?

What is above you?
Do you know where it goes?
Do you know if you've ever been?
Have you been told how it flows?

What is beside you?
Is it really next to you?
Or is it really across?
If it looks red is it really blue?




*** ok ppl cut these ones a break... i wrote them like 8 years ago while in highschool

2006-07-03 06:07:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if the question is asking if there is life on other planets other than earth, that question has been proposed many time and many different ways. With all the sightings around the world and still no real evidence of other life or beings I am leaning towards no. Only because of the lack of real hard touchable evidence if there was life outside of earth i believe we would have by now factual hard touchable evidence

2006-07-03 05:45:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

we don't understand even though that's a threat. What we predict of all of us understand is that for existence to adapt a planet could must be approximately our length, super adequate to hold an ecosystem and sufficiently small that this is gravity did no longer overwhelm something much less reliable then a rock. it may must be in with reference to a similar place we are in relative to our sunlight so it replaced into heat adequate to help existence and not so heat that protein chains and amino acids could no longer kind. maximum in all threat it may ought to have a huge furnish of water. technology fiction speculates that there must be different varieties of existence in accordance with something different then carbon yet we will not help that. we have no thought how many worlds there are yet statistically that's in all threat that others greater wholesome the invoice. yet they could be uncommon and on those worlds allot of issues could ought to circulate basically good for existence to adapt and then evolve intelligence. even though that's amazingly a threat and greater in all threat then the thought that there is no different clever existence interior the universe. yet we don't understand and except that existence contacts us we will not understand for somewhat an prolonged on a similar time as.

2016-11-01 03:37:25 · answer #4 · answered by sokin 4 · 0 0

Yes there is life in the heavens...and very similar to our own...but the chemical compositions that DOMINATE will probably be in qauntities that are not favorable for us but say the fish that live in the bottom of the ocean or volcanic activeities but since that type of atmosfere isdominate the 'creatures' would be like our own on/in earth....

2006-07-03 06:38:46 · answer #5 · answered by BILL P 3 · 0 0

While there is no scientific evidence of life existing elsewhere, in the words of "Men In Black": "It's a big a** universe".
To assume there is no life out there is a little silly. We simply do not yet have the resources or ability to fully explore the universe.

2006-07-03 05:43:09 · answer #6 · answered by KB OH 2 · 0 0

Our Star (sun) has 9 planets with one holding life. Our galaxy, milky way has Billions and billions of stars. If each of those has 9 planets, that makes trillions and trillions of planets in our galaxy. Then, there are billions and billions of other galaxys. The number of planets is probably 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

The odds that we are the only ones is nonsence. However, we are looking.

2006-07-08 06:38:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As someone else once said: If we are the only life in the universe, what a colossal waste of space!

2006-07-03 07:35:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yep sure i am sure cuz such a large is the universe and it could not be possible that life only exist on planet earth dude.See ya.

2006-07-03 05:54:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Kinda a big waste of space if life doesnt exist anywhere else in the universe.

2006-07-03 05:43:20 · answer #10 · answered by profit0004 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers