I believe that you are correct.
After all he has done exactly what he condemned Saddam Hussein for doing; invading a country that was no threat to the US, and using terror weapons (MOAB's are just that) and chemical agents (US troops routinely use White Phosphorus against not only "insurgents" but civilians as well).
So, yes. I believe that Bush is the single most dangerous terrorist in the world today.
2006-07-03 02:14:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
A terrorist is a person who terrorises ppls minds, in that sense a pesron who can terrorise the most number of ppl is the number one terrorist.
A person with lot of power still very ruthless person is an ideal choice for this posotion.
SO probably Bush with the most strong Military in the world under him and with so much ruthlesness should be the Terrorist number one.
2006-07-03 02:21:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by friend 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lets see:
Kills innocents without a second thought? Check - See Iraq War.
Gains power through fear? Check - See Patriot Act, Terror Levels, etc.
Are there other qualifications for being a terrorist?
As far as being number one, he does control the worlds largest military, and uses his power to threaten countries around the world. He is at least in the running.
2006-07-03 02:27:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by John J 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Osama Bin weighted down is a terrorist. He makes no secret of this actuality and demands attacks on all who do believe him. George Bush is the president of united states of america of america. he's not calling for the eradication of everyone. The conflict in Iraq might want to end tommorow if the insurgents and those fascinated in sectarian violence would lay down their fingers and attempt for peace contained in the area. certainly Freedom combatants are frequently said as terrorists. the adjustments that you fail to charm to close between both circumstances you aspect out are below. a million) the yankee Revolutionaries did not call for the eradication of the British. additionally they did not pursue the British to their abode united states of america with the intention to finish extra attacks. 2) the yankee revolutionaries were said as terrorists through the British because of procedures used. they'd the audacity to conceal in the back of rocks and timber, quite than lining up in a instantly line to wrestle the British head on. 3) the yankee revolutionaries did not deliberately target the civillian inhabitants with the intention to salary conflict adverse to the British. Your rivalry about 9/11 is without foundation and betrays a misinformed attitude. there has been no credible data provided as a outcome far to genuine indict the Bush administration. rather what we've is supposition and a widespread tendancy to push aside actuality and eye witness testimony with the intention to make a thorough case that may not stand on actual exam of knowledge. contained concerning no matter if Islamics perpetrated the attacks we've sufficient data of their complicity, not the least of it really is the declare through Osama Bin weighted down that he orchestrated the attacks.
2016-11-05 21:05:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Now that Saddam Hussein is out of the way, I would have to say Kim Jung Il of North Korea is number one. Only an ignorant fool would say President Bush.
2006-07-03 02:17:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by JAMES O 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say the Al Queda leadership, Hamas leadership, Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro are some top choices.
Bush has made some very poor decisions, but I don't characterize him as a terrorist.
2006-07-03 02:39:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Islamo-Fascist PIGS in IRAN< SYRIA
2006-07-03 03:15:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well actually I believe its the terrorist that are doing more of the killing of other middle easterners. So by those numbers your question and opinion do not hold water.
2006-07-03 02:15:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bin Laden. P.S. Learn to spell.
2006-07-03 15:57:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by SeahawkFan37 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
osamin bib laden
2006-07-03 02:16:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by ADAM J 1
·
0⤊
0⤋