I suggest that say, after two kids, men who aren't in relationships, be bribed to be sterilised. It might save the state a lot of money in the long run and who knows? They might even use the money to pay for a college course? What do you think?
2006-07-03 01:43:47 · 19 answers · asked by True Blue Brit 7 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
OK - and women too! It's just that one man can spread his seed far and wide but no woman in this day and age would have 7 kids by the time they're 21!
2006-07-03 01:55:34 · update #1
Aha! But what if ... and keep this quiet ... the money was then classified as income and given to the kids?
2006-07-03 02:53:53 · update #2
This isn't China - you can't force someone to be sterilised if they don't want to be. What's the next best thing?
2006-07-03 08:59:41 · update #3
awsome idea you should come to america and run for president thats the smartest dang thing ive heard all year!
2006-07-03 01:48:00 · answer #1 · answered by mojomuppet 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
In truth, whilst this man is a complete idiot, he did find 7 complete idiots to sire his children. The simple solution would be to ban idiots from having children. I liked the comment about sterilising men after two babies who are not in relationships. I would also extend this to females too who, after all, do not have the greatest track record about bringing shildren up on their own.
2006-07-09 01:32:42 · answer #2 · answered by NICOLA K 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't think they should be paid as they may all become fathers early to get the money. I think we should cut benefits, free housing etc, make them support the family themselves after all they make the choice to have a large family.
2006-07-03 01:53:51 · answer #3 · answered by wombat 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way - If they thought there was money in it they would all want 7 kids!
Seriously though if he weren't the father some other poor dope would be. He didn't force them to have his kids now did he.
2006-07-03 08:32:57 · answer #4 · answered by 'Dr Greene' 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he or anyone like him should be paid anything - I think the benefits agency should give all benefit he qualifies for to his kids, and have his testicles forcibly removed if he fathers any more b*stards on vacant slappers.
2006-07-03 04:35:39 · answer #5 · answered by Rotifer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say that he should be given less unemployment allowance and that money should go to the children. Also why are these girls/women allowing themselves to become pregnant when they must know about his reputation.
2006-07-03 01:49:18 · answer #6 · answered by mistymiss 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm, i don't think so- perhaps just fund the procedure. I'd also suggest that you offer the same incentive to women- they're just as capable of being stupid with their reproductive rights.
2006-07-03 01:50:05 · answer #7 · answered by AJ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I think paying them is bad..... I think they should be made to pay not to get the snip and this money should be used to help raise their own kids!!!!
2006-07-03 01:48:09 · answer #8 · answered by break 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
interesting concept. if they are bribed and actually given money and a choice (vs court-ordered which is a bit creepy), might not be a bad idea.
2006-07-03 01:46:12 · answer #9 · answered by alter_tygo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES...he should be paid with a kick up his **** beforehand. and his parts snipped right off and sold to that german doctor who puts them in exhibitions.. he could generate the income from them to support his brood!!
2006-07-07 08:31:36 · answer #10 · answered by ruth p 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No!
They should learn self control or have the snip at their own expense.!(Incidentally there are such things as condoms you know)
2006-07-04 18:23:17 · answer #11 · answered by stanleyhallwood 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋