2006-07-03 01:27:26 · 4 answers · asked by Carlos M. Fabara 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I have a good friend that could be completely trusted to handle this affair. He is on here frequently and his name is Mr. Retardo, Jr. Now don't let the name fool you, it's an alias.
2006-07-03 01:47:22 · answer #1 · answered by Melissa C 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Power corrupts.Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Hence the need for checks and balances. This is fundamental to a society believing in rule of law. The principle is reciprocatory. For example if Judiciary is a check on Executive then some functions of judiciary also need to be verified and checked by he executive while both are supposedly independent. Same principle goes on trickling down to the lowest echelons of administration. If a teacher is assessing a student then students too have a right to comment how a teacher is performing and so on.
2006-07-03 08:39:08 · answer #2 · answered by openpsychy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we could get enough support for a legitimate third party it would keep our politicians more honest. It would have to start with a stronger role in the house and senate. Then if the third party ever managed to get their presidential canidate elected he wouldn't be as easily filibustered by the Republicans and Democrats. Right now the two party system has a stranglehold on power thus dividing instead of uniting We The People. The only thing they do agree on is NOT having a third party to share the power with. A two party system is not what our founding fathers thought would be productive.
2006-07-03 08:59:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
FIRST: Honest checkers and balancers.
2006-07-03 08:31:09 · answer #4 · answered by ed 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋