English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-03 00:51:07 · 18 answers · asked by paul1953uk 3 in Sports Football FIFA World Cup (TM)

Rooney used violence twice. Is this correct? Are you suggesting violence is an acceptable way to conduct yourself.

2006-07-03 02:42:24 · update #1

18 answers

No, when you enter a sports event you give consent to being subjected to the normal rough and tumble of that sport even if it's outside the rules. If it were otherwise all ice-hockey players would be in jail!. If what Rooney did was really heinous then he could be charged, but what Rooney did happens all the time in soccer.

2006-07-03 01:00:37 · answer #1 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 8 0

A rather silly question,if you don't mind me saying so. Look,it was a game of football. ALL the matches had incidents and aggressive behaviour Portugal/Holland springs to mind here. Many of the Portugal players should be prosecuted if Rooney is.There was little difference! If you think about this incident with Rooney,just for a minute,he's a hot headed lad who loves his football. He's impetuous to say the least,so do you really think that he would have tried to hide what he was doing?? He would have done it openly,just like the shove/push on spiteful Renaldo.Rooney had two/three players all after the ball,unfortunately in the scrabble that followed Rooney accidentally stepped on the other player. Of course it happened to be Portugal they were playing,we all know what great actors that team are!! Yes Rooney stepped on him,ACCIDENTALLY,yes Rooney pushed stupid, childish Renaldo,which was planned, by the way,but that makes him no worse than almost every other player in ALL the teams!! So prosecute them all?? I think not!!

2006-07-03 01:46:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If this is the case then German police has to charge many English fans outside the stadiums who did the grievious boldily harm by breaking bottles and hitting the Germans....but anyway God charged them already by giving them the game with penality kicks ....hehehehe, So I think now there is no need for German police to charge Rooney or any English fans ;-) .....

You can read more about disturbance made by english fans in Germany in below link

2006-07-03 01:09:24 · answer #3 · answered by saadia k 2 · 0 0

it is an exceedingly vast question. Atheism actually skill 'without god' and because maximum human acts of devastation have been interior the call of one god or yet another, this might recommend that they are much less risky than those with a faith. in case you think of roughly it in a extra precis way, atheism promotes unfastened questioning and the choice to believe what you want without the seize 22 problem of somebody telling you what is right with none information. in this way, many faiths easily sell lack of expertise over wisdom. (The reasoning at the back of this lays with early society human beings attempting to sort a conceivable society that applications properly jointly. faith is an exceedingly valuable thank you to try this, for this reason why there are maximum of similarities between them). So reckoning on what you recommend by employing harm, in early human society atheism might have been extra unfavourable to the form of the human race yet in recent cases (the final a hundred and fifty years or so) faith is dropping its place in present day society.

2016-12-10 03:55:12 · answer #4 · answered by binford 4 · 0 0

It a high energy sport, and lots of accidents will happen. It's stupid to bring the police in for a situation like that. Just cause you don't like Rooney is no reason to do that.

2006-07-03 01:04:47 · answer #5 · answered by Ryan 4 · 0 0

For what reason if your on about the carvalho incident how can it be grievous bodily harm when he (carvalho) got up and played football for another 58 minutes. I am getting quite used to answering these inane questition`s

2006-07-03 00:59:34 · answer #6 · answered by madge 51 6 · 0 0

why charge the kid when he tried his best to keep his calm.....ronaldo was over-acting & tried to convince the ref for a harsher treatment....it was a gentle push from Rooney & I have seen more serious assaults in Football & players getting away with it.......time to give the kid a break......last but not the least I am still not over & done with England losing to Portugal....Becks stepped down as captain.........alas!!!!!!!

2006-07-03 01:03:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Grevious bodily harm!! So you are indicating that stepping on the player was deliberate! You are wrong and should go back to whatever sad little world you came from!

2006-07-03 00:58:22 · answer #8 · answered by CRAIG 2 · 0 0

Considering the player recovered and continued for the rest of the game without any problem i think the question asked is completely irrelevant

2006-07-03 00:56:34 · answer #9 · answered by sweynseye 4 · 0 0

I would charge Ronaldo for over acting

2006-07-03 00:57:26 · answer #10 · answered by Michael B 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers