We all know that the 9/11 perpetrators used the USAF/NORAD war games as cover, to mask the hijacked planes, create confusion and to delay the emergency response. It also turns out that the first commercial flight of the Concorde after the July 2000 crash was on September 11, and the supersonic plane was over the Atlantic as the attacks on the towers were taking place. Was this a coincidence or does it somehow play into the theory of who was behind the 9/11 atrocities?
2006-07-03 00:15:48 · 2 answers · asked by gradient descent 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Concorde crashed because a piece of metal on the runway caused a tire to shred, and the piece hit the engine which started a fire. Clearly not because of terrorism but a horrible accident. But the first commercial flight after the crash was on 9/11. I'm just curious if this was a coincidence, an otherwise monumental aviation event taking place on the same day as the terrorist attack and the US wargames.
2006-07-03 00:34:00 · update #1
I think the two events were unrelated, but given the tangled webs that exist in government, could it be that 9/11 was only a gimmick to incite a war? As time passes, we learn of the CIA's various plots around the world. Would it not be shocking to learn that the CIA (with big business in mind) contrived an event like the sinking of the USS Maine and the Gulf of Tonkin incident?
2006-07-03 00:34:36 · answer #1 · answered by Frank 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
concorde didnt crash because of terrorism, it was because of debris on the runway.i hardly think the two are linked in any way, shape or form.
2006-07-03 00:22:19 · answer #2 · answered by greengunge 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋