1.The money should be refunded if the ticket has not been used.
2.The ticket is to be refunded as he has not traveled.
2006-07-02 22:52:07 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Homework Help
I would say:
The money will be refunded if the ticket for travel has not been used.
number 1. says "should be refunded" which sounds like an a conditional refund if travel has been used.
number 2: Is an awkward straight forward statement, using the pronoun "he", and possibly confusing "as" with "if"...
2006-07-02 23:01:08 · answer #1 · answered by jrteter2 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
#1 sounds okay. It could be rephrased as "The money should be refunded if the ticket is not used."
As for #2, it just sounds confusing and jumbled up. But I think it could still be grammatically correct. Maybe, "The ticket should be refunded if he did not use it"???
Those are my best guesses.
2006-07-03 08:42:56 · answer #2 · answered by Vanessa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi, I wish I had an idea of the context but this is what I can best offer:
In the event the ticket is unutilised, the amount ought to (will) be refunded.
2006-07-02 22:59:53 · answer #3 · answered by freudianslipper 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
#1 looks okay.
How about for #2: The cost of the ticket is to be refunded to the individual due to nonuse.
2006-07-02 22:59:16 · answer #4 · answered by figaro1912 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gimme my money back.
2006-07-02 22:55:28 · answer #5 · answered by Scozbo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
grammar
2006-07-02 22:55:46 · answer #6 · answered by sarah b 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋