why do we need luck more than scientific method. our stand is the luck thingi. PLS HELPP!!!
2006-07-02 22:30:20 · 10 answers · asked by JuNjUn 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
because chances are......
2006-07-02 22:34:03 · answer #1 · answered by Susie K 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Let me get this straight: the "luck thingi?" You sir, have a mastery of linguistics beyond any fathomable conjecture I have summoned.
btw, Susie K, probability has very little to do with the assertion of a childish concept of luck.
2006-07-03 05:35:02 · answer #2 · answered by [ΦΘΚ] PIяATE 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
luck is better because scientific method isn't always right when luck you always have a 50 50 chance!
2006-07-03 05:56:38 · answer #3 · answered by TiNaNa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's scientific method then serendipity.
2006-07-03 14:41:05 · answer #4 · answered by Balthor 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because science can't prove with a time machine and a video camera
2006-07-03 06:28:13 · answer #5 · answered by 22 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because ****, (Luck, in Australia)
Beats class.
2006-07-03 05:37:04 · answer #6 · answered by D 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
most of the scientific findings are accidental
2006-07-03 05:37:02 · answer #7 · answered by raj 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One who uses scintific methods will be more luckier than one who does not use it.
2006-07-03 08:29:48 · answer #8 · answered by Pearlsawme 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because sometime it's better to be lucky than it is to be talented....
"Chance favors a prepared mind."--Louis Pasteur
2006-07-03 05:35:49 · answer #9 · answered by m137pay 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can you rephrase this quesiton in such a way that it makes sense? Thanks
2006-07-09 16:58:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋