Which of these situtations do you consider to be moral...or do you consider them all to be immoral?

Question

1. Putting human cells (brain cells or otherwise) in other animals (like mice)

2. Puting human fetuses (even dead fetuses) in other animals

3. Combining human and animal genes to create anthromorphs

Please do not consider any other circumstances other than those that I have provided in the three situtations. Please keep in mind that these situtations can be for whatever reason, so do not think about any purposes or intentions, but just focus on the situtations.

Answer 1

All moral (and all already underway).

Answer 2

I Consider Them All Immoral...Human Life Is Precious. It Shouldn't Apply In These Situations

Answer 3

I would say the first is moral in some situations, bc all you have to do is let a dog bite you and your cells will be in the dog. I can't think of any moral reason for the other two, so I would say they are immoral.

Answer 4

All the above are morally wrong and will no doubt all done, if they are not already, but then I think most (unfortunately not all) animal testing and research is sick and unnecessary. See a film from the 80's called "Pennsylvania Primates" if you want proof of the horrors that are inflicted on dumb animals behind closed doors.

Answer 5

1 and 3 are fine by me if we must test vaccines I prefer animal testing to people.2 seems sily I see no purpose.
I think people are just afraid of what would happen to religon if animals began to speak and ask if god is for them as well. at what point does life equate a soul?

Answer 6

Immoral? More like insane. Were you considering doing one of the above?

Answer 7

There is no limit to what man can achieve because God gave us brains to use but what may constitute sin in your examples would be "who gets the glory, God or man?"

Answer 8

nothing immoral there, as long as the living humans concerned are consenting.

Answer 9

1. immoral
2. immoral and despicable
3. immoral

Answer 10

Moral.
And scientific.