2006-07-02 21:48:40 · 23 answers · asked by d1mPz 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Why not both? I think "6 days", as in 6 24-hour periods, is a bit of a stretch, but who's to say that God didn't say, "Let there be light," and then BANG?
2006-07-03 00:27:45 · answer #1 · answered by nardhelain 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Big Bang is believable but there should have been a God that created big bang, maybe you can reinterpret Bible and you will get a big bang or maybe you can just believe in God and believe He made the big bang skiping Bible's creation...
I don't really know what to believe but I really wish I would, I think about these things all the time cuz I do care of religion but I cant believe it even when I want to because there are lots of things that just make no sense so at the moment I am still trying to fit religion with reality and I will tell you if I ever get a good xplanation.
2006-07-02 21:58:02 · answer #2 · answered by aoc10010001100 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they're not in contradiction. They both can be true. I believe God created the universe in this way.
Ask this question from yourself: ``What was before Big Bang?'' I can answer this question, only if I believe in God.
I think it's really simple. The one who created the universe, did this in the best way. It seems without this assumption, no-one can answer this question.
It seems that there should be a beginning, but what was before that? God, in the world of abstracts, that has no time...
I think science can lead to find God, and with some assumptions, it can deduce that there's a God.
2006-07-02 22:04:08 · answer #3 · answered by blue_I 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
to extremely understand the bible wisely you apart from could could extremely ought to important in it. to no longer point out your assumption has some contradictions with reference to Christians. The proponents of the super Bang theory have been began via A CHRISTIAN, approximately 1500 years in the past. (a million) That each and every thing recedes back to a one factor, that rely and time began on a similar time, fits somewhat nicely with the Genesis interpretation of the Bible and the super Bang. in case you desire to appreciate greater such via fact using day interior the Genesis you're able to see that it ability "Yom", this be conscious even though ability greater beneficial than in basic terms an afternoon interior the Bible-it additionally ability a year, 1000 years, months, seasons, or an indefinite volume of time. surprisingly whilst it is composed of the 1st day of introduction, you're able to see that the sunlight is extremely no longer created neither is the Earth-that would mean there is no 24 hour degree of an afternoon. (2.) i assume that does take a sprint examine and probable advice from discovered Biblical pupils....that studied the Bible and Languages of the Bible and characteristic earned their Doctorate and a minimum of their Masters.... do no longer fool different Christians into thinking that they are in a place to't have faith interior the super Bang, this is silly.
2016-11-01 03:14:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you want to look at it in a theological standpoint then it's mGod that madi it happen. The big bang is the scientific version. It is a theory supported by researched possibilities just like God creating the universe.
When you are in doubt that's when you look at faith-your faith.
It could also be possible that the Big Bang was masterminded by an Omnipotent being greater than you and me
2006-07-02 21:53:55 · answer #5 · answered by mariezernalynpalmares 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It just depends on your beliefs. People cannot make up your mind for you. I believe in God. Okay get this... if these "particles" can "just be floating in space" to make the big bang, WHERE did the particles come from? Invevitably, it was somehow created. Even if you beleive God created the particles and then the Big Bang took place, I cannot deny a greater being.
2006-07-02 21:52:25 · answer #6 · answered by xeroxpoop 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no way to know for sure. But the biblical tale has no use as a predictor of future events, while the Big Bang theory does. As long as it continues to make predictions which turn out to be true, scientists will continue to make use of it. If it comes up with wrong answers, the theory will be modified as needed to fit the new data.
-- Robert A. Saunders, Lake Stevens, WA.
2006-07-02 21:56:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Big Bang is more believerable then GOD
2006-07-02 21:50:05 · answer #8 · answered by Iceman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Big Bang theory is more plausible to me than a fictional being glorified to create conformity and a book similiar to the boogey man's to scare you from sinning.
2006-07-02 21:53:52 · answer #9 · answered by lildarlinkristisue 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God is a pathetic excuse for a theory - them god worshippers believe that the world is only 7000 years old! What!?
2006-07-02 21:50:58 · answer #10 · answered by Ben 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋