English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Portugal also kicked them out of Euro 2004.
Coincidence I think not.

2006-07-02 20:19:38 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football FIFA World Cup (TM)

Rooney is not that great of a player. He is a sad runner. Kind of Offie!!!

2006-07-02 21:16:08 · update #1

12 answers

I guess the English had great expectations from their National Team (and they are just a bit arrogant too) so it's hard for them to accept that the World Cup is over for them.
I also think a huge mistake is that they underestimated Portugal. They should have kept in mind that Portugal is a strong team, great, talented players and a very clever coach.
Anyway, I wish Portugal the best of luck, France is a strong team, but surely not unbeatable.

2006-07-02 20:37:59 · answer #1 · answered by Kicky 6 · 5 0

Portugal didn't play a better game...otherwise, their 11 men would have beaten Englands 10 during the 120 mins. It was even. Portugal won the penalty shootout...a lottery...basically no different from drawing a name from a hat. I think, come Weds night, we'll have a lot of bitter Portuguese fans moaning about losing to France and claiming they played a 'better' game.
Ps...sure you kicked us out of Euro 2004...but i seem to remember Portugal losing...at home to Greece (a team that didn't even qualify for the World Cup)..in the final. Hmm

2006-07-02 22:57:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The English, being the creaters of the modern game of football have always felt it was their game, and so should be better at it.

The problem is, they may have created but (it used to be Brazil) others perfected it.

Big Phil Scolari is a far better tactician and ogranizer than Sven Erikson, and that being the main key to the Portuguese victory is what would drive any Englishman mad. Having a wealth of talent on the England squad made no matter as the Portuguese shut down all of the creative ball movement, playing to their own strengths.

England just can't acknowledge that for 5 years they had a manager that just didn't get what England wants to see, really see... Instead they were willing to overlook Englands crappy playing and say "If it gets us to the final, we don't care" and like Brazil just afterwards, they were shown the door.

2006-07-02 20:33:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh yes!! Cristiano cheated!!!!! REALLY!!!????? With all those people looking on he cheated!! Funny thing is only the Portugal haters are saying immature things like that! Portugal outplayed England and yes, Scolari is great and he is a major part of the reason Portugal has gotten to the semi-finals! Rooney got kicked out by his own actions end of story!

2006-07-03 09:48:10 · answer #4 · answered by blu441980 2 · 0 0

Portugal didn't play the better game. They were lucky Rooney was hot tempered YOB and red carded. If a yellow card was pulled out, I think England would have prevailed.

2006-07-02 21:04:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Maybe because the way how portugal played 'better' was just with acting to send off team mates and the great portugal team was not able to win with 11 against 11 so they made that dirty trick with cristiano ronaldo winking back to his team mates and scolari after sending ronaldo off?

2006-07-03 01:16:03 · answer #6 · answered by Michael B 2 · 0 0

If Portugal had played a better *game* they would have won in regulation. They took better PKs, but play just as well and not better than England. Accordingly, England played just as well and not better than Portugal.... and then took horrible PKs.

2006-07-02 20:25:28 · answer #7 · answered by buxinator 3 · 0 0

England played a better game... Portugal has a better goalie in Ricardo

2006-07-02 20:35:32 · answer #8 · answered by Todd Maz 4 · 0 0

i think the forthure of england is worse than other teams, i like beckham ,but he cant paly as the team leader. i feel very sad these days! meantime,i think france will kick portugal out of the 1/4 final

2006-07-02 20:26:03 · answer #9 · answered by peng t 1 · 0 0

Halo: attain is an user-friendly and forgiving shooter for persons new to the kind because of the fact of shields and radars. too plenty magnitude is located on the acqisition and use of skill weapons, regardless of the incontrovertible fact that. call of duty video games are thrilling, yet demanding. In Halo, in case you get shot interior the back, it fairly is even nonetheless each man or woman's sport in case you alter around and return hearth good. In CoD video games, in case you get shot interior the back, you DIE. CoD video games tend to have extreme emphasis on cover and suggestions - frequently by ability of skill of the time a shot's fired, the winner is desperate. In Halo video games, working in screaming with a shotgun/attack rifle is an more suitable-than-accessible tactic. Halo Wars is unquestionably thrilling, evaluate it regardless of in case you dislike the technique kind as an entire. I used to hate technique because of the fact gameplay tended to spending long minutes, even hours, doing repetitive progression and then quarter-hour of attempt against. In Halo Wars, the source kit and progression kit has been simplified and streamlined so which you will have the skill to concentration on the attempt against. And opposite to what you will be able to pay attention, that's plenty from ineffective on line, there are even nonetheless hundreds of game enthusiasts.

2016-12-08 15:10:05 · answer #10 · answered by bucks 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers