Extensive Question about Light Quanta regarding absolutes with respect to light speed?

Question

I will add details in this question please read all before responding, I will continue by writing continued between the singular thought, and I will state end of question at the end of the added details column if I am unable to submit this in its entirety then I will remove it.

Question = If C is the absolute speed of light, and with direct regard to our own measurements of distance which have been formed based upon our perceptions relative to ourselves, and our atoms size respective state of existence with in our universe.

Also based upon common sense given the fact that we know Light Quanta is pulled by gravity then the bending of light off of linear momentum around black holes would not be distorted space time, but bent light curving off of linear trajectory around the quantum singularity with direct respect to the quantum gravity of the quantum singularity.

Continued below

Magnetism's affect upon light with regard to the unbalance of motion which functions with in it by design should increase wobble causing distortions in the visible light spectrum's which would also account for visible distorted light shifts.

The Light Quanta in and of its self must be a tangible particle then which demonstrates wobble while in motion, and with respect to it's unbalance with in its own design, and the wave function of light Quanta then must be only a mere observed affect of the light Quanta function.

Thus I believe that Light Quanta is a Particulate matter energy which demonstrates a wave function while in motion with direct respect to wobble, or unbalanced motion.

The proof I offer in support of my thought regarding Light Quanta is with respect to mere common sense as since Light Quanta is pulled by Gravity it must have mass, and since it is pulled by Magnetic force then it must have with in its design a property which is affected by Magnets.

Continued

If then Light is tangible then it also must be considered a real particulate mass just as real as a rock, however functioning above the state of gas with respect to our understanding, and would then actually also be it's own elemental functional state with respect to design, and the function of it which rises above gas is only with respect to it's size state of existence with in our universe.

If Light then is a tangible thing, which common sense tells us that it is, then with respect to it's speed it must function with respect to it's design with in the point value size respective energy state, and cannot have a absolute speed, but only speeds based upon variables, and the function of its speed would be in direct correlation with another unknown variable which would have to be in my view one of two possibility's, or the combination of both, and that would be universal expansion combined with universal linear momentum, or an independent function of either one or the other.

If I am correct then light speed cannot be an absolute speed but only demonstrate a relative speed based upon unaltered circumstances with respect to motion in space but function with respect to universal motion, which is linear momentum of the universe, and universal expansion.

I believe that it would be more appropriate to refer to C then as relative light speed as with direct respect to the Light Quanta's Particulate mass density and size with in the point value size independent reference state then placing a accurate measurement upon it based upon our own measurement reference state is very much like rounding numbers, and there is no accuracy in rounded numbers.

Continued below

Also based upon common sense given the fact that we know Light Quanta is pulled by gravity then the bending of light around black holes would not be distorted space time, but bent light curving around the quantum singularity with direct respect to the quantum gravity of the quantum singularity, and magnetism's affect upon light with respect to the unbalance of motion which functions with in it by design should increase wobble causing distortions in the visible light spectrum's.

Thus I believe Mr Einstein's equation should be more correctly termed E=MrC/2 or Energy equals Mass moving at relative Light Speed Squared, as the speed at which light travels is only relative to the size of the observer with in the point value reference state, and a accurate measurement for Light Quanta's interactions with, and upon all point value size reference states should be devised, as with respect to all reference states time then is either hyper accelerated, or extremely slow.

Continued below

I would very much like to know what do you think regarding this?

Please be kind

I wish to thank everyone whom responds to my question, as with respect to my question I do not pretend to be correct, and acknowledge the fact that I may very possibly be wrong with some of my beliefs expressed here. all of your thoughts are valid to me, and I find them extremely helpful and will give all of your response's full consideration.

Thank You Again

If According to special relativity, the speed of light is invariant, i.e. and it is a universal constant as explained to me below, irrespective of how it is measured or of the apparent motion of an observer. and also, special relativity says that there are no absolutes, then this only further convinces me that as I said there can be no universal constant to the speed of light, and also confuses me as to how special relativity can contradict it's self because if there are no absolutes, then there can not exist an absolute universal constant as I stated and light speed could only maintain a relative Light Speed as I believe, and stated, and variable rates with in the speed of light must exist, as without absolutes constants could not be maintained, and can therefor not exist.

End of question here

Answer 1

matter and energy are all one in the same one is just finer than the other and ther is an etire universe filled with matter we don't even know exists. so in a since your right and i have heard somthing similar to what your saying. keep up the thinking.

Answer 2

Hi Thoughtfull

You wrote: "I would very much like to know what do you think regarding this?"

With the utmost respect to your musings above, I think that if you're really interested in developing your ideas further you need to learn some basic physics. There are a lot of simple misunderstandings or misapprehensions in your ideas at present - wouldn't it be great if you had the skills to be able to critically analyse and refine your work yourself? The good news is that with a little application you can equip yourself to do just that, and then you'll find your theories will improve.

For what it's worth, here are some fundamental corrections:
* as mentioned above, light couples to gravity because it has energy and momentum, not because it has mass. relativistic gravity couples to the stress-energy tensor (a complicated mathematical object), not to "mass". quantum electrodynamics (qed) requires that the photon mass is precisely zero.
* for the purposes of most applications photons actually do not interact with magnetic fields. photons have zero charge and so aren't deflected by the field. *however* photon-photon interactions are possible according to qed

Hope this helps!
The Chicken

Answer 3

First, you are wrong to state that light must have mass because it is affected by gravity. Gravity affects both matter and energy since matter and energy are equivalent. Also Einstein demonstrated that gravity distorts spacetime, and anything that travels in spacetime, such as a light beam or light quanta, must follows the geometry of spacetime; hence the path taken by light is the curvature of spacetime. So light can be massless and be influenced by gravity (this phenomenon is called gravity lensing). So everything else you concluded based on light having mass are wrong.

Second, your point about the nature of light must be related to magnetism is correct. Light is an electromagnetic wave, as well as a particle called photon. This is the particle-wave duality, a fundamental feature of our physical world. Also, the relation between light and magnetism is that electric and magnetic fields are mediated by virtual photons.

Answer 4

According to special relativity, the speed of light is invariant, i.e. it is a universal constant, irrespective of how it is measured or of the apparent motion of an observer. Also, special relativity says that there are no absolutes: there does not exist a preferred frame of reference; all frames of reference, however moving, are equally valid. Common sense does not necessarily give correct answers when you're doing relativity -- if in doubt, you have to do the math.
-- Robert A. Saunders, Lake Stevens, WA.

Answer 5

You confuses me. Light, then on mass, then on Einstein.

Well, in regards to Einstein theory, 'C' is constant in respect to the 'M' mass concerned. 'E' energy is equals to the multiplication of (M) mass to the (C) constant in the power of (2) two. and that was in Einstein theory.

On light, it curves as it reflects to the objects that it had glown, thereby reflections upon reflections.. As what Einstein have observed that you can see a star behind the sun during eclipse and you can see the man behind the two trains passing each other in opposite direction perfectly in its perfect image. So, by observation alone, you can say that an object travels in respect to the basis on another object as you have base on what you have observed is the speed of light, as you see you could not see the train, while focusing on the man. :o)

Answer 6

C is a contemplation of a limit that I imposed upon my own conciousness. What if C concious thought was my onlz limit. How come everz time I think out of bounds mz kezboard reverts to a German kezboard and mz zäs are yäs. I f I want to tzpe a y then i must tzpe Zee.
A paranoid man would think the Germans as yeast.

Answer 7

First, pardon me for twisting a quote by (below) A. Einstein...but ( you have some creative powers) but ...--stating your question in a succinct and less roundabout manner would be helpful....--

Having the ability to think out of the box...is often more productive than crunching numbers.....


Imagination is more important than...." A. Einstein

Answer 8

of cource gentle, and if u dont have confidence and opt to confirm it virtually some day.. hav u ever seen crackers tht explode interior the sky far removed from u, in such circumstances u see the gentle first however the sound comes after a whilst because of the fact velocity of sound is ver very much less while in comparison with that of sunshine

Answer 9

thanks for the 2 points