OMG Exactly!!!
Geez trying to figure out what else to say but I honestly think you just said it all!!
PS. Check out my answers. I am never left speechless. LOL
2006-07-02 13:21:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Are you an absolute idiot?? Have you looked at their system of government? The people still have a say. And the main reason the crime rates are so low is that they don't put up with the junk. If you kill someone, you get it right back. And the ruling monarch is more of a symbolic ruler anyway. Back in the 1500's the House of Commons and the House of Lords took the power upon itself with the help of the Nobles. Now, the people have a say in just about everything. The people elect the members of the Houses, and get to vote in just about everything. And they don't have Left wing groups trying to undermine their authority at every turn. Oh, and have you read history? Socialism beleives in the distribution of wealth among the people, which means that if you are rich, you about to become very poor. Equal rights to all, even non-citizens and criminals. And do you remember the people who were at the head of such movements?? Napoleon, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Saddam. These are just a few. And you would like to see one of your Left wing Socialist party forerunners up in the big seat? And it's freedom of religion. The founding fathers were christians. And In God We Trust belongs on our money and Under God belongs in our Pledge. If it offends Atheists and Muslims, then not having those phrases would offend me. If they can get what they want, then why can't I and every other upstanding Christian Conservative American? Why do we have to cater to their needs and put everything right that offends them? Because that would offend an even greater number of people. The Conservative Party.
2006-07-02 13:40:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Randall M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Exactly!
Both want to oppress women, socially, mentally and economically
Both only think of education in religious and simple terms, unless it comes to teaching the severe biases of history, and how to be patriotic, and "tough", as well as self-serving
Neither believes in real democracy
Both would colonize the entire world to serve their short-sighted cause if they could, but neither successfully fools everyone.
Both support torture.
Both think higher crime rates are great because their "crackdown" ends up reinforcing their power.Of course, the irony is that they are also criminals.
Both think that non-heterosexuals,people of different appearances, those who differ from the status quo, Jews, artists and free-thinkers are lesser than them.
And most importantly, most everything they do worsens the state of the world.
2006-07-02 13:24:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mira Bella 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree it is time for a regime change here in america. but, as much as i hate republicans, i don't think they are quite that extreme.
also, if you view the political spectrum as a circle, then the moderates are in the middle at one end, with the extremist of both sides together on the other end. yes there are extremist liberals. im pretty radical myself
2006-07-02 13:19:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
once you're staring at for a heritage it extremely began in the time of Goldwater's campaign even as the Christian desirable became once first forming, the leaders took an activity in Goldwater, notwithstanding it actually wasn't until eventually Nixon's Southern technique the position he pandered to the Christian proper to win the South (and hence on the time the election). the priority is that once everybody is indoctrinated like the persons you're speaking about are it may properly be just about no longer accessible to motive with them and a politician does no longer extremely have a purpose to attempt to modify reviews, in a democratic device that is way less difficult to attain and guard energy by skill of pleasing to a delegated base. it may properly be even a lot less difficult to promote books to them which do not contradict thier beliefs, have a glance on the politics section at your community bookshop. i'd say it may take about thirty to 40 years at minimum or 50 to sixty years at maximum. it really is how lengthy that is going to take the nut-jobs to die, with slightly of luck after residing chuffed lives now no longer ruined by the reassurance guidelines they propose, and hence stop vote casting. yet then provided that intellectuals paintings flat out to coach and encourage youthful persons. Oh and for the persons who favor to call one i am going to do you an extra desirable a itemizing of the non secular idiots ruining the GOP: Pat Robertson, former presidential hopefull Michelle Bachaman, Congresswoman contemporary presidential hopeful Rick Perry contemporary Governor of Texas prayed for rain even as slicing the fireman's money for the length of wildfires Jerry Falwell lifeless now yet founding father of the "moral majority" Robert grant writer of The Christian Voice Ralph E. Reed, Jr. obviously the manager of The Christian Coalition Oral Roberts lifeless notwithstanding founding father of Oral Roberts college which seems "proficient" zealots. Mark Rutland took over from Oral i'd pass on notwithstanding it may get too lengthy
2016-11-30 04:23:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by mizer 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You sound like a throwback to the late 1960's and all the paranoia and naivete and immaturity which prevailed all through the hippie era. Are you one of the original "hippies" who hasn't grown up, or are you a "new breed". God Bless you.
2006-07-02 13:19:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are who we are because of what we are. We are the Greatest Nation in the world. Besides, it's too late for that. The U.S. was built on Democracy......(Even though I know sometimes the Govt. isn't honest.)
2006-07-02 13:19:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by ebony0225 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who is we? I am not part of any we that includes you & other racist & bigoted political or any other group. You insult millions of Republicans with your blanket statement. You know nothing about me, my friends, relatives & complete strangers. Shame on you for your insults.
2006-07-02 13:19:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You lost ha ha you lost ha ha love it leave it jerk. I guess you would rather return to that jerk off you all elected Republicans rule and rock.
2006-07-02 13:35:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
grand oppression party? wow, that's original
2006-07-02 13:17:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by emelia 2
·
0⤊
0⤋