English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Bush administration has military plans drawn up in anticipation of having to destroy Iranian nuclear facilities.
Conservatives are arguing that America’s position in Iraq would improve if Iran chose to retaliate there, because Iranian interference would divide the Shiites into pro- and anti-Iranian camps, and unify the Kurds and the Sunnis. The Iran hawks in the White House and the State Department, including Elliott Abrams and Michael Doran, also have an answer for those who believe that the bombing of Iran would put American soldiers in Iraq at risk: “Yes, there will be Americans under attack, but they are under attack anyway.”

2006-07-02 12:18:43 · 8 answers · asked by Biomimetik 4 in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

So Bush has killed over 500.000 Afghans, 400.000 Iraqis and now wants to add Iranian blood too???

2006-07-03 08:22:26 · answer #1 · answered by Zorro 3 · 4 1

The painful truth is that Iranian Shiite fighters have already crossed the border in significant numbers in support of Al-Saydr.

We can't pretend that Iran is not actively engaged against in Iraq already.

And quite honestly, Iran has and continue to support terrorism against this nation. As much of a Liberal as I am, there is no country I would enjoy seeing us beat the snot out of more than Iran. This is a sad thing to say, because Iran is certainly filled with so many decent people, but they are truly led by some very arrogant and twisted men.

2006-07-02 19:24:20 · answer #2 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 0 0

And maybe we can get the Turks and the Pakistanians to cross over into Iraq and have one helluva big old-fashioned war! And pretty soon other "million-man" volunteers will march over to join in and all of the warring factions can fight it out until the last man is standing in Iraq! Wow!
Sure, there's risk for American soldiers. But as Dumb-and-Dumber Don Rumsfeld said at a press conference once when asked about putting soldiers at risk, "Stuff Happens."
By the way, I'm not ridiculing you, the author of this question - I'm ridiculing the idiocy of the Bush administration and its cowboy tactics and strategies that it seems to believe will actually produce positive results. Their mission has failed miserably; we're in a situation that we should have never put ourselves into in the first place. And now, because of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and a compliant, cowardly, corrupt Congress, more than 2,500 U.S. soldiers have died. -RKO-

Check out the new blog book - BUSHWACKER!
www.blogger.com
http://al-aback.blogspot.com

2006-07-02 19:28:27 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0 0

If one million Iranians crossed the border into Iraq to fight our troops, we would have enough air support to handle the situation. Yes, some people would die in the combat, but our troops are loyal, well trained and most believe in what they are fighting for. How can anyone put a value on the USA? Isn't she worth fighting for?

2006-07-02 19:27:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The US under any president dem or rep have to have war plans draw up for any thing that could happen.

I am sure they even have some plan in case Canada attacked.

2006-07-02 19:26:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

whatever. so what. US soldiers rape women and kill babies in Iraq (but of course you dont hear about that on cnn and abc etc) then come back home and are honored. for what? its nauseating. why do you think the whole world is against you. they cant all be wrong.

2006-07-02 19:31:51 · answer #6 · answered by rumpel 4 · 0 0

i dont even think theres a million iranians.

2006-07-02 19:26:22 · answer #7 · answered by hewwy12 1 · 0 0

they need a lot more solder's I don't want to get drafted

2006-07-02 19:22:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers