2006-07-02 12:16:25 · 17 answers · asked by LedZeppelin4ever1955 3 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Dolphins- no question, they had the O & D, Bears just had D.
2006-07-08 21:54:25 · answer #1 · answered by zack 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the 72 phins, no contest. the bears had sorry a** jim mcmahon at QB, what would he have done againsdt the no name defense? NOTHING. hell they couldn't even beat the 85 phins let alone the 72 team. the 72 phins had the greatest offensive line of all time, larry little, jim langer, bob kuchenburg, norm evans and wayne moore. not to mention a hall of fame RB, larry csonka, a hall of fame QB, bob griese, and a hall of fame WR, paul warfield. as good as the 85 bears defense was(and they were great, i'll give them their props)that incredibly talented offense would have been able to put points on the board. the question is, what would the mediocre bears offense(all due respect to sweetness, he was a man among boys, a thourobred amongst broken down mares)have done against the great no name defense. they shut the redskins out(the only TD was on garo yapremians INT)and they had a much better offense than the 85 bears. the bottom line is the 72 fish were a complete team, the first team in NFL history to score the most points and allow the fewest in the same year, while the 85 bears had a great defense(maybe the best ever) that carried their so-so offense.
2006-07-02 13:40:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The '85 Bears as the guys on the Marine Mammals of '72 are all over 50 easy now.
Given the opposition they beat, the '85 Bears had a way tougher sked. I'd go with them in some computer simulation game.
2006-07-03 15:58:04 · answer #3 · answered by fugutastic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
72 Dolphins
2006-07-02 17:54:21 · answer #4 · answered by jliljay 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the two important issues of making this style of assessment are that a million) gamers tend to get greater proper conditioned over the years (this is, the common participant in 2000 is going to be swifter, greater appropriate, and so on. than the common participant from 10 years till now) and that the policies continuously exchange, so which you're able to ought to state which set of policies you have been going via. in case you compensated for the the 1st, i think of the Dolphins could have gained. a million) The '80 5 Bears ought to have had Payton, however the 'seventy two Dolphins had Kiick, Csonka, and Mercury Morris. The working interest replaced into so dominant that Miami nonetheless gained whilst Greise (a HOF QB) went down for most of the time-honored season. 2) The Dolphins proved they could win 2 SBs in a row. 3) the only TD the Dolphins allowed of their SB replaced into off a fluke interception thrown via their field purpose kicker. 4) on a similar time as the Bears scored greater factors, in addition they had to play a rather weaker opponent.
2016-11-01 02:44:07 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
85' Bears. Enough Siad
2006-07-02 13:54:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
72 Dolphins had D too and enough offense to win a squeaker
2006-07-02 15:06:30 · answer #7 · answered by -:¦:-SKY-:¦:- 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
85 Bears!!!
2006-07-02 15:53:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
72 dolphins. until someone goes undefeated there the best.
2006-07-03 07:53:48 · answer #9 · answered by david c 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
85 bears by far!
2006-07-02 13:54:58 · answer #10 · answered by dkwr14 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋