Finaly, liberals, is this proof enough?

Question

the link befor was bad, that doesnt make it less true;I have heard plenty of 9/11 conspiracy theorists, and sceptics saying Bush never told the truth about anything. But finaly i can prove there were WMDs in Iraq, this has been verified by your precious UN.
http://editorials.arrivenet.com/government/article.php/279.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1022824/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1656781/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1654193/posts

Answer 1

The liberals always knew there were, and proof does not stop them. We had labs they were made in, scientist that made them, and delivery systems for them. But that did not prove their was any.

Sadly of course we knew they had them because we gave them to them or help them develop them, remember we supported Saddam against Russia to "free" Iraq. Only he turned against us after he did.

Also Bush only tells what he is told, he had no real way of knowing if they did or if they didn't. So even if there were none at all, he beleived there was from what he was told.

Answer 2

Yes, there are WMD in Iraq- but don't stop with your research there- let's not forget the Reagan Administration supplied them to Iraq to fight against Iran, so there shouldn't be any surprise that the weapons are there! Further, your research will also tell you that the master minds behind the Iraqi invasion of Iran is none other than your boy, Rumsfeld himself!

And while your at it, why don't you look for the video that shows Bush admitting that Iraq didn't have anything to do with 9/11, and then lying about ever having said that.

Answer 3

You have proved nothing, the weapons inspecters knew where these chemical warheads were and we "found them" at a real conveniant time. It is just more right wing rhetoric that couldn't be the farthest from the truth. And you are probably the worst of all for spreading the "word" get a grip cause I have got to tell you that this is no left wing jibberish when I say that Bush is not only the worst president but also the biggest threat to American freedom. I sure hope that you reexamine your support of him because it takes a big person to admit when they are wrong.

Answer 4

I think liars are worse than conspiracy theorists *yawn*

How about posting an unbiased media report rather than relying on the propaganda of a conservative rag such as the New Republic?

Answer 5

If there were WMDs in Iraq, do you think the administrtion needs you to spread the word?

Answer 6

even bush said that Iraq did not have wmd,so the report are just move right-wing lie's

Answer 7

No, it really isn't. But so what, does it really matter to you if they were there or not??

The war is on and appears to have no short term end in sight.

Dude, if it makes you feel better about the invasion, then cool.

My "Liberal" view remains unchanged. We shouldn't be there.

Answer 8

The Internet is a world of corruption and lies so beware, I can put whatever I want on the web but that doesn't make it true.

Answer 9

And this is proof how???? Just because it is written, doesn't make it so. Three years and 2500 dead Americans later. You must work for big oil.

Answer 10

So now he lied when he said the information was flawed . I am so confused . When Clinton was ask . Did you have Sexual relations with M. L.? He ask them to define it . They Did . Based on their definition . Hes said he did not have sexual relations with that woman . THEY DEFINED IT ..