Would naked be considered completely bare from head to toe? Is naked just the absence of clothing, per se, or can you wear accessories and still be considered naked?
2006-07-02 11:26:57 · 18 answers · asked by heykarrol 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I'm not asking about the sexiness factor - just technically speaking, what would you consider to be "naked". Is it really different from "nude"?
2006-07-02 15:15:11 · update #1
I would consider accessories to not be clothing to count against nakedness. To be naked, a person should not have a shirt, bra, pants, skirt or underwear on. You could still wear shoes and socks and jewlery. Its just the general effect of showing all of your bits that makes you naked.
2006-07-04 16:05:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Naked is when you show "the naughty bits," as the Brits like to say.
Somehow, wearing clothing only on your head, hands, and/or feet is even "naughtier" than being truly stark naked. Stark nakedness is almost "wholesome," whereas wearing accessories but being essentially naked implies sexiness.
2006-07-02 11:32:21 · answer #2 · answered by Cyn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jewelry aint cloths... if a female, from the male pov, is "naked" but wearing jewelry or shoes... it is an even greater turn on for the majority of male egos
all you have to do is look at the way most "mens" magazines photograph women to see this.
as for me I prefer A'natural... But in my now Christian Faith Walk I do try to avoid looking twice. But I am still mortal fter all.
2006-07-02 11:34:22 · answer #3 · answered by IdahoMike 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, some of the best dressed nudes accessorize.
So, naked, but with a tasteful scarf or hat, is still naked.
2006-07-02 11:30:12 · answer #4 · answered by Stuart 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you're not wearing clothse or swim suit, you're naked. If you're wearing a hat and shoes, you're 98 percent naked. If you're body and feet are bare and you're wearing a hat, you're 100% becuase the head doesn't count in terms of being naked.
2006-07-02 11:31:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I never thought of that before. i suppose if you had nothing on but a pair of socks you'd still be considered naked... i'd say you're naked if your naughy bits are showing... lol.
2006-07-02 11:31:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if you are wearing just accessories, and no clothing yes you are very naked my friend.
2006-07-02 11:33:42 · answer #7 · answered by Sakura ♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, technically "naked" means unprotected. "Nude" means without clothing. I would count it as meaning absence of clothes. Personally I would have to keep my glasses on, but I don't count them as clothing.
2006-07-02 11:30:10 · answer #8 · answered by sunnyannie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would define naked as having your private areas showing or close to it. if your wearing stuff like u mentioned then it is covering your bare skin a little
2006-07-02 11:29:57 · answer #9 · answered by *~*MaryAnn*~* 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Naked is as naked does.
2006-07-02 11:29:32 · answer #10 · answered by Zabela 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋