2006-07-02 10:40:37 · 12 answers · asked by ? 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
The whole napster bs a few years ago did me in and I'm sure it did a lot of their fans in too.
2006-07-02 10:42:18 · answer #1 · answered by Isles1015 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Metallica have been around forever and with time and age it's best not to maintain the mullet. James looks way better as a Rock-a-Billy! Lars and his run in over Napster was pretty played out. Didn't hurt him as bad as PearlJam and Ticketmaster. after What 20 years a band has to change and grow. Somethings fans won't like and somethings they will love. And a fans likes maybe based at when they can into likely a band too. If you were listening to Ride the Lightening in middle school you might be offended by the new and improved band.
2006-07-02 17:47:29 · answer #2 · answered by r_me_wyf 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jsut the image. I think the aging of the band effected the music. Newstead leaving James having to work with a different bass player. I think Lars' control over the metallica image money, really hurt their image. I dont knwo what goes on behind closed doors but it seems like Lars tries to control James I also believe rehab had its number on him. I am gonna hope ST ANGER rolls over and they produce another quality metal album. But The hair didn't effect the music.
2006-07-02 17:43:43 · answer #3 · answered by BIFFERD 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO cutting there hair had nothing to do with the music. Come on think about it the hair did not hold the power of music
I honestly think they just wanted a change man they sang the same type of music for like 20 years before they changed jame still has that rock hard voice and can still tear up a fu*king guitar
just go to a concert he will prove to you he still has it
2006-07-02 17:45:08 · answer #4 · answered by shellshell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man..its Lars fault...he probably told the band that they should get modern or something like that..I say this caus in the Some kind of monster he is the one saying that solos are an old thing nad they are not cool anymore...Whats up with that!!...he probably got Mustaine kicked out...he was jealous..anyways..they changed their music because they wanted to reinvent themselves or modernize...so they changed the hair too because of that..........damn, that long hair was so cool....did you see the live s**t? it IS the s**t...they were so full of power those days..too bad I never got to see them....
2006-07-02 17:46:55 · answer #5 · answered by Soreblack 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're hair has nothing to do with they're ability to put out good music. What kind of people think that your ability is dependent on the length of your hair?
2006-07-02 17:46:19 · answer #6 · answered by Jacqueline 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do u think that image influences music.?I dont think so...they sing with their skills in music...voice and guitars, drums...not with their hair...and i thinik it doesnt matter how they look , their music is the same...u can listen to them usig audio cd-s or tapes...would u guess how their hair looks like by this?:)
2006-07-09 07:32:45 · answer #7 · answered by cobain_ritzi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont think the hair affected anything, i think the hair was an affect, they're gettin older and wantin to try new things (such as st. anger) and i dont think people should be too critical towards them about wanting to and having the courage to try something new
2006-07-02 17:44:02 · answer #8 · answered by unforgivenIII 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey once u got the following they are gonna listen no matter what image its all about talent .. they need to grow as anyone else and go thru changes ..
2006-07-02 17:44:20 · answer #9 · answered by gypsygirl731 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it did. Personally I want James Hetfield should grow back his muttonchops Ã
2006-07-03 16:18:11 · answer #10 · answered by lookiehere...000 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋