Due to distance limitations from local CO, many people can only
receive lower speed DSL. If remote terminals were installed, then
the distance problem would be solved and higher spped DSL
could be achieved. With the usage of remote terminals, then more people could then receive faster DSL as well as ATT Homezone. The distance barrier is the barrier to overcome.
2006-07-02 10:27:42 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet ➔ Computer Networking
they arent gonna install them if there isnt a huge customer base there, its a buisness. itd be a waste and hassle
2006-07-02 10:32:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What do you mean by "remote terminals"? Surely you don't mean remote users? Perhaps you are thinking of repeaters that boost the signal and make it go farther. According to Wikipedia, "This is a very new technology which allow DSL to travel longer distances to remote customers. One version of the repeater is installed at approximately 3 km (10,000 ft) intervals along the trunk line, and strengthens and cleans up the DSL signal so it can travel another 3 km (10,000 ft)." It just may be that they don't want to spend the money on the equipment (which would also require electricity to run it) when they get so little money from DSL lines. The equipment would probably run into the thousands of dollars.
2006-07-02 10:36:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
image taken for the period of WW II shows all around st Paul's burning and then the remarkable dome exhibiting above the rubble. The British human beings worked puzzling to maintain ST Paul's and Prince Charles and Princess Diana have been given married there in 1981.
2016-12-10 03:40:58 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've been told it is. I apparently have "slower" DSL, but I'm charged less than those with "faster" DSL because of that.
2006-07-02 10:31:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋